Yes, having a interface which can also control clocks is great. I used to write some code myself to debug clocks, so I have the same feeling with what you said.
BTW, 'cheers' is normally used in Australia and New Zealand. Are you from there? Just curious. :) Yong On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Sundar <sunder.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Kevin Hilman > <khil...@deeprootsystems.com> wrote: > > > [..] > > > > That being said, I'm not against $SUBJECT patch, but I question it's > > usefulness in terms of PM. What's more valuable for PM is the statitics > > and knobs exported on a per-device level by the runtime PM core (and > > AFAICT, already included into tools like powertop.) > > > IIRC, Vincent's suggestion is more valid for the HW guys who want to test > out all kinds of possibilities *before* the OS and the support for the > drivers > becomes mature enough to concentrate on statistics and so on. Even I > remember > our HW guys requesting for bersek controls over regulators and clocks as a > part > of platform validation, when the OS was not mature enough in terms of a > complete > system-support. > > Cheers! > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-dev mailing list > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
