(Apologies for previous empty mail; trying again...)
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > since it is the only one that compiles for me. However, to my
>> > understanding, this is not a very 'saf
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > since it is the only one that compiles for me. However, to my
>> > understanding, this is not a very 'safe' branch to use on daily basis.
>> > Is that true? Is
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > since it is the only one that compiles for me. However, to my
> > > understanding, this is not a very 'safe' branch to use on daily basis.
> > > Is that true? Is there a
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > [...]
> > since it is the only one that compiles for me. However, to my
> > understanding, this is not a very 'safe' branch to use on daily basis.
> > Is that true? Is there a more 'stable' git branch which I can compile as
> > thu
Hi Markos,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:37:19PM +, markos.chand...@gmail.com wrote:
> First post on this list so I apologize in advance if I post on the wrong
> list.
Welcome to the list!
> I am desperately looking for a working thumb-2 kernel tree. I am
> currently using the dirty/arm/omap-th
