(Apologies for previous empty mail; trying again...) On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > [...] >> > since it is the only one that compiles for me. However, to my >> > understanding, this is not a very 'safe' branch to use on daily basis. >> > Is that true? Is there a more 'stable' git branch which I can compile as >> > thumb-2 and use it for my projects. I keep searching online for >> > kernel+thumb2 references and most of them point to this linaro git tree. >> >> My understanding is that the omap thumb2 support is fully merged in the >> current 2.6.38 tree, available at >> <git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.38.git>. We've been
You shouldn't rely on my trees for something stable-- they're just a testbed for changes which aren't upstream yet, and may contain patches which don't get upstream, as well as getting rebased rather frequently. The .38 tree is new, and my patches were only pushed there yesterday... but I suggest to move to it now that it's available. >> discussing just today on IRC where and how to enable this for wider testing >> in precompiled package form; if you're looking to get at thumb2-enabled >> source, that's definitely the tree to go to. >> > > Excellent. I wasn't aware of that tree to be honest. I briefly looked > for a gitweb on linaro.org but I didn't find anything. Anyway, I will > check that tree as soon as possible. Can you please tell me or redirect > me to the policy of that tree compared to the mainline kernel? For > example, is this tree following the mainline kernel closely or it is > your "playground"? There's some explanation of the the main kernel/linux-linaro-xxx trees on git.linaro.org here: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/KernelConsolidation/KernelTree Hope that helps! Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
