Facilitator :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facilitator
I know I am adding my 2 cents a little late, but there I dropped it in the
collection plate.
Amber
On 25 April 2012 11:40, Jesse Barker wrote:
> Funny, I took champion to be the equivalent of the sponsor of a
> requirement (i.e. to champ
Funny, I took champion to be the equivalent of the sponsor of a
requirement (i.e. to champion the topic at the TSC level). I guess
we'd better be more explicit in our nomenclature.
cheers,
jesse
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:16 PM, David Rusling
wrote:
> See my earlier email. They can be differe
See my earlier email. They can be different or the same it's up to you...
Dave
Sent from my iPad
On 25 Apr 2012, at 05:50, Arwen Donaghey wrote:
> All,
>
> My understanding was the session lead is not necessarily the champion. The
> champion is the 'guru' or 'owner' of the topic, and the
Champion arranges the meeting the session lead runs it, they can be the same
person
Dave
Sent from my iPad
On 24 Apr 2012, at 23:17, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote:
>> All,
>> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it
>>
All,
My understanding was the session lead is not necessarily the champion. The
champion is the 'guru' or 'owner' of the topic, and the session lead is exactly
that… the session lead. There are a number of sessions covering various areas
of one topic potentially? Please do correct me if this i
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote:
>> All,
>> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it
>> here
>> - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0a
On 25 April 2012 03:47, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote:
>> All,
>> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it
>> here
>> - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gi
On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote:
> All,
> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it
> here
> - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gid=0.
> Arwen is happy that that spreadsheet will
All,
I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can
find it here -
https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gid=0.
Arwen is happy that that spreadsheet will be used for the session
planning. I've ad
All,
thank you for a lively discussion.I think that there's some very
good ideas floating about. It's clear that we all care passionately about
make Linaro Connect as good as it can possibly be. Some comments:
[1] What is the problem that we're trying to solve? It is, in my vie
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 20 April 2012 14:20, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 12:58, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2012 14:47, Deepak Saxena wrote:
On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrot
On 20 April 2012 14:20, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 12:58, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 14:47, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wr
On 19 April 2012 12:58, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 14:47, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> While we're pla
On 19 April 2012 14:47, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> While we're planning for
On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
w
On 19 April 2012 14:29, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
>>> with team tracks all together and just
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
>> with team tracks all together and just have topic tracks. This would
>> align with our topic
On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
>>> with team tracks all together and just have topic tr
On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
>> with team tracks all together and just have topic tracks. This would
>> align with our topic based appr
On 19 April 2012 10:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
>> with team tracks all together and just have topic tracks. This would
>> align with our topic based appr
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
> with team tracks all together and just have topic tracks. This would
> align with our topic based approach to things now, and would be a way
> to breakdown our sil
On 18 April 2012 12:45, David Rusling wrote:
> Hmmm. I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's.
> Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as
> before...
I think Kiko's topics are good too. Perhaps if we also added, will
demonstrate on p
On 18 April 2012 15:15, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:45 PM, David Rusling
> wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm. I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's.
>> Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as
>> before...
>>
>
> where are kik
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:45 PM, David Rusling wrote:
> Hmmm.I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's.
> Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as
> before...
>
>
where are kikos topics?
--
Alexander Sack
Technical Director, Linaro
Hmmm.I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's.
Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as
before...
Dave
On 18 Apr 2012, at 16:43, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
> with tea
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 18 April 2012 12:05, Tom Gall wrote:
>> I like the idea of topic focused sessions, not sure I'm sold on a
>> complete switch.
>>
>> I've got an initial list of top sessions at
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/DraftPlan/2012-2QLC above a
On 18 April 2012 12:05, Tom Gall wrote:
> I like the idea of topic focused sessions, not sure I'm sold on a
> complete switch.
>
> I've got an initial list of top sessions at
> https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/DraftPlan/2012-2QLC above and beyond
> that sessions I've already proposed.
Hmm.. link l
I like the idea of topic focused sessions, not sure I'm sold on a
complete switch.
I've got an initial list of top sessions at
https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/DraftPlan/2012-2QLC above and beyond
that sessions I've already proposed.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Stephen Doel wrote:
> Hi Zach
On 18 April 2012 11:40, Stephen Doel wrote:
> Hi Zach,
>
> Yes, this is a recurring discussion before Connects. Almost every time, we
> try to go Topic based, and each time we end up cycling back to Team Tracks.
> So, if we can get a good set of Topics, we're open to change
I saw some good to
Hi Zach,
Yes, this is a recurring discussion before Connects. Almost every time, we
try to go Topic based, and each time we end up cycling back to Team Tracks.
So, if we can get a good set of Topics, we're open to change
Thx
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Zach Pfeffer [mailto:zach
31 matches
Mail list logo
