On 21 February 2012 16:37, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Amit Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> Hi kukjin Kim,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> I was on travel for elc and linaro conferences so little late for
>> replying. Thanks for testing these patches.
>> I just submitted the V6 series of the cpuidle patchset. I rebased it
>> against
Amit Kachhap wrote:
>
> Hi kukjin Kim,
>
Hi,
> I was on travel for elc and linaro conferences so little late for
> replying. Thanks for testing these patches.
> I just submitted the V6 series of the cpuidle patchset. I rebased it
> against the 3.3-rc4 kernel version. I also tested it for SMDKV31
Hi kukjin Kim,
I was on travel for elc and linaro conferences so little late for
replying. Thanks for testing these patches.
I just submitted the V6 series of the cpuidle patchset. I rebased it
against the 3.3-rc4 kernel version. I also tested it for SMDKV310
(evt1) and Origen (evt1.1) boards and
Amit Kachhap wrote:
>
> Hi Amit Kucheria,
>
Hi all,
(Cc'ed Jaecheol Lee and Jongpill Lee)
> I have asked the samsung maintainer(Kukjin Kim) to queue this patch set 1
> month back. But seems like it is not present.
>
If it works fine, then I'm apply this series.
But now it is not working. As
Hi Amit Kucheria,
I have asked the samsung maintainer(Kukjin Kim) to queue this patch
set 1 month back. But seems like it is not present.
Hi Mr Kim,
Can you please queue this patchset in your tree for next merge window?
The V5 version submitted fixes all the known issues.
http://lists.infradead
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> - Various patches from Linaro
>
> * samsung_cpuidle_l2_retention patch set from the power management WG
Amit, is this now in your maintainer's tree queued up for 3.4?
___
linaro-dev mailing lis
