On 8 July 2011 12:50, john stultz wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:35 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 1 July 2011 12:14, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> > Each of the trees have various tags and branches based on how each
>> > team and developer
>> > works and I don't want to ask folks to change what
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:35 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 1 July 2011 12:14, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> > Each of the trees have various tags and branches based on how each
> > team and developer
> > works and I don't want to ask folks to change what they are doing for
> > their day to work.
> > Wh
On 1 July 2011 12:14, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> Each of the trees have various tags and branches based on how each
> team and developer
> works and I don't want to ask folks to change what they are doing for
> their day to work.
> What I'd like to see is a a separate set of official trees that only
>
On 1 July 2011 12:21, Andy Green wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
>> What I'd like to see is a a separate set of official trees that only
>> get updated with bits that
>> we are ready for non-Linaro developers to use, do not get rebased, and
>> get tagg
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 10:25 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andy Green wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be less ridiculous than issuing monthly tarballs for the kernel
>>> case.
>>
>> why do you think that ta
On 07/04/2011 10:25 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andy Green wrote:
It would be less ridiculous than issuing monthly tarballs for the kernel
case.
why do you think that tarballs are ridiculous? even kernel.org
releases tarballs last I looked.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Andy Green wrote:
>
> It would be less ridiculous than issuing monthly tarballs for the kernel
> case.
why do you think that tarballs are ridiculous? even kernel.org
releases tarballs last I looked. IMO you can prefectly have tags +
tarballs coexist and everbody wo
On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
What I'd like to see is a a separate set of official trees that only
get updated with bits that
we are ready for non-Linaro developers to use, do not get rebased, and
get tagged at the
end of each monthly cycle. My proposal:
ker
