On 9 January 2013 16:50, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int
> cpu)
> +{
> + cpufreq_frequency_table_update_policy_cpu(old_cpu, cpu);
> + cpufreq_stats_up
On 10 January 2013 16:05, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Another thing, can i have a tested-by from you for both my patches ? remove
> and
> add dev?
>
For both:
Tested-by: Shawn Guo
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.
On 10 January 2013 13:24, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> @Shawn: I believe your driver don't require that ugly code anymore (Though i
>> know there is a situation for that to happen, if we have two cpus, you remove
>> second one and then add it
On 10 January 2013 13:24, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Yes, just played it and it works for me. However, I would have to keep
> that little ugly code in my patch to save the dependency on your patch.
> Will send a follow-up to clean that up once your patch hits mainline.
Good. Hopefully, patches from both
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @Shawn: I believe your driver don't require that ugly code anymore (Though i
> know there is a situation for that to happen, if we have two cpus, you remove
> second one and then add it back. With this cpufreq_add_dev() would call init
On 9 January 2013 21:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I have tried that too, it is also pushed at:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/16/5
Bad link :(
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cpufreq-fixes-v2
___
linaro-dev
On 9 January 2013 21:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 January 2013 16:50, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> [Probably need to simplify cpufreq_add_dev() too, but that can be done as
>> next
>> step.]
>
> I have tried that too, it is also pushed at:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/16/5
>
> [Untested for now
On 9 January 2013 16:50, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> [Probably need to simplify cpufreq_add_dev() too, but that can be done as next
> step.]
I have tried that too, it is also pushed at:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/16/5
[Untested for now, will be doing it tomorrow]
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed, 9
