On 10 January 2013 13:24, Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> @Shawn: I believe your driver don't require that ugly code anymore (Though i >> know there is a situation for that to happen, if we have two cpus, you remove >> second one and then add it back. With this cpufreq_add_dev() would call >> init() >> first and then try to match if there are any managed_policies present. But >> the >> issue you pointed out about unregistering the driver would be solved by this >> patch.) > > Yes, just played it and it works for me. However, I would have to keep > that little ugly code in my patch to save the dependency on your patch. > Will send a follow-up to clean that up once your patch hits mainline.
Another thing, can i have a tested-by from you for both my patches ? remove and add dev? That would help it go quicker. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
