Hi Catalin,
> > Our plan is definitely to get this into the Linaro kernel for the
> > 11.05 release. My preferred approach is to get it into Catalin's
> > public tree by early Q1, so that we stand a chance of merging it into
> > the Linaro consolidated kernel.
>
> Another step before this would be
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 18:21 +0100, Bobby Batacharia wrote:
> > Yes, the earlier the better to starting incorporating the
> > changes in Linux.
[...]
> Our plan is definitely to get this into the Linaro kernel for the
> 11.05 release. My preferred approach is to get it into Catalin's
> public tree b
s fixed secure code.)
-Bobby
> -Original Message-
> From: Shilimkar, Santosh [mailto:santosh.shilim...@ti.com]
> Sent: 18 October 2010 08:09
> To: Bobby Batacharia; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> > ---
ent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:08 AM
>> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
>> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>>
>> Santosh,
>>
>> Again - apologies for the tardy responses to this thread.
>>
>>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Bobby Batacharia [mailto:bobby.batacha...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:33 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks f
g that.It's doable but it will end up with some SOC specific execeptions.
Understood.
-Bobby
> -Original Message-
> From: Shilimkar, Santosh [mailto:santosh.shilim...@ti.com]
> Sent: 18 October 2010 06:19
> To: Bobby Batacharia; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.o
Bobby,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bobby Batacharia [mailto:bobby.batacha...@arm.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:08 AM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Santosh,
>
>
gt; Sent: 12 October 2010 12:03
> To: Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Jon
> > -Original Message-
> > From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> > boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
this work in time..
-Bobby
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org
> [mailto:linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Amit Kucheria
> Sent: 13 October 2010 09:42
> To: Jon Callan
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re:
linaro.org]
> Sent: 12 October 2010 13:32
> To: Jon Callan
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> :)
>
> As you can see, if you make the source available somewhere, there is plenty
> of people interested in dissecting it.
>
&
amit.kuche...@linaro.org]
Sent: 12 October 2010 13:32
To: Jon Callan
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
:)
As you can see, if you make the source available somewhere, there is plenty
of people interested in dissecting it.
Jon, if you start working on them i
ation from 1st December. I have done some
> Linux kernel work before but I'm a little rusty.
>
> Jon.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Kucheria [mailto:amit.kuche...@linaro.org]
> Sent: 12 October 2010 12:04
> To: Jon Callan
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.
rusty.
Jon.
-Original Message-
From: Amit Kucheria [mailto:amit.kuche...@linaro.org]
Sent: 12 October 2010 12:04
To: Jon Callan
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
Jon,
I'm sure you anticipated this - What is your plan for pushing this
October 2010 11:48
To: Jon Callan
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
Hi Jon,
That is a nice follow up to the OMAP idle code clean up, cf.
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2010-October/001084.html.
It would be nice to see how the code is
Jon,
I'm sure you anticipated this - What is your plan for pushing this out
to the kernel? :)
And how can we help?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jon Callan wrote:
> Vishwa,
>
> I have a more-or-less complete set of example code for CPU context
> save/restore, currently supporting A5/A8/A9 a
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Jon Callan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:10 PM
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Vishwa,
>
> I have a
Hi Jon,
That is a nice follow up to the OMAP idle code clean up, cf.
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2010-October/001084.html.
It would be nice to see how the code is organized and the impact of
integrating it into the kernel.
Regards,
Jean
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jon Call
>
>On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Nicolas Pitre
wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Purpose of this email is to debate on the pros and cons of having a
common
>> ARM context save/restore code.
>> Currently each SOC has its own way of saving/restoring ARM reg
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Purpose of this email is to debate on the pros and cons of having a common
> ARM context save/restore code.
> Currently each SOC has its own way of saving/restoring ARM registers and
> there has been a proposal to have a common code for
19 matches
Mail list logo
