Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-21 Thread Tushar Behera
On 17 October 2012 21:26, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On 10/17/2012 10:41 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: >> >> On 10/06/2012 02:37 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Minor change to the plan: >>> * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0* >>> * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-201

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-17 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 10/17/2012 10:41 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 10/06/2012 02:37 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Greetings, Minor change to the plan: * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0* * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121006.0 * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012., ll code freeze (no

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-16 Thread Tushar Behera
On 10/06/2012 02:37 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > Minor change to the plan: > * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0* > * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121006.0 > * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012., ll code freeze (no >massive ll topics updates after th

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro + call for 12.10 topics

2012-10-09 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Greetings, On 10/06/2012 01:07 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Greetings, Minor change to the plan: * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0* * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121006.0 ll-20121010.0 has been pushed to linux-linaro-tracking.git. The pinned manifest is: http://git.linaro.o

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-08 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Hi Tushar, On 10/08/2012 08:04 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 10/06/2012 02:37 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Greetings, Minor change to the plan: * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0* * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121006.0 * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012., ll code

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-07 Thread Tushar Behera
On 10/06/2012 02:37 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > Minor change to the plan: > * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0* > * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121006.0 > * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012., ll code freeze (no >massive ll topics updates after th

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-07 Thread Andy Green
On 06/10/12 08:52, the mail apparently from Ricardo Salveti included: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 10/05/2012 12:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:02 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: don't we need some kind of notification system where you

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On 10/05/2012 12:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:02 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: don't we need some kind of notification system where you announce a plan to rebuild linux-linaro and give us a versio

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Greetings, Minor change to the plan: * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0* * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121006.0 * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012., ll code freeze (no massive ll topics updates after that; bugfixes only) Thanks, Andrey On 10/05/2012 05:25 PM, J

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 17:03 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On 10/05/2012 12:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:02 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > >>> don't we need some kind of notification system where you > >>> announce a plan to rebuild linux-linaro and give us a v

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 10/05/2012 12:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:02 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: don't we need some kind of notification system where you announce a plan to rebuild linux-linaro and give us a version of llct to base our LT branches off? Yes, this makes sense. Would

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Tushar Behera
On 10/05/2012 01:42 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:02 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>> don't we need some kind of notification system where you >>> announce a plan to rebuild linux-linaro and give us a version of llct to >>> base our LT branches off? >> >> Yes, this mak

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:02 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > don't we need some kind of notification system where you > > announce a plan to rebuild linux-linaro and give us a version of llct to > > base our LT branches off? > > Yes, this makes sense. > Would the following plan be OK: > ( should

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-04 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Hi Tixy On 10/04/2012 12:55 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Hi Andrey Now I'm providing a single LT topic based off linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct), and you said that you need everyone to base off the same version of llct, Yes, this is currently the case. don't we need some kind of notific

Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-04 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
Hi Andrey Now I'm providing a single LT topic based off linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct), and you said that you need everyone to base off the same version of llct, don't we need some kind of notification system where you announce a plan to rebuild linux-linaro and give us a version of llct to bas