On 10/05/2012 01:42 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:02 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>> don't we need some kind of notification system where you >>> announce a plan to rebuild linux-linaro and give us a version of llct to >>> base our LT branches off? >> >> Yes, this makes sense. >> Would the following plan be OK: >> (<N> should normally be 0, but may be a small positive number) >> * till the end of this week please use llct-20121004.0 as the base for >> the linux-linaro (ll) topics >> * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121005.<N> >> * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012.<N> >> * October 23: ll rebuild based on llct-20121019.<N>, ll code freeze (no >> massive ll topics updates after that; bugfixes only) > > Is this month following the normal release cycle? If so, isn't the > release day Oct 24th, and release candidates are built from the previous > Thurday's code, i.e. Oct 18th. I.e. the freeze for the release should be > Oct 16th not 23rd? > > Also, I assume we're not going to try to move to Linux 3.7 this month? > Samsung LT release would be based on Linux-v3.6 final release, no plans to move to 3.7 during 12.10.
-- Tushar Behera _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
