Matthew Gretton-Dann writes:
> Can you please provide the output of:
> 1. arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
> 2. arm-none-eabi-gcc -print-multi-lib
Yeah, I figured it out, thanks -- the patches I had to add ARM multilib
support updated configure.ac but I didn't rebuild the configure script,
so my attempt
On 7 October 2013 11:30, Matthew Gretton-Dann
wrote:
> On 7 October 2013 05:20, Keith Packard wrote:
[...]
>> 2) The thumb version of libgcc.a is not built with thumb instructions
>> because GCC doesn't pass -mthumb to the assembler when it receives
>> -mthumb on the command line.
>
>
Keith
On 7 October 2013 05:20, Keith Packard wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes:
>
>> attaching a diff, comparing the two branches at a merge point
>> (r201326), 398 lines.
>
> Ok, thanks very much for this simple patch. First the good news -- I
> applied this patch to the 4.8.1 GCC sources included
Matthias Klose writes:
> Am 19.08.2013 17:27, schrieb Keith Packard:
>> Wookey writes:
>>
>>> The alternative it to simply repack the existing linaro
>>> cross-toolchain sources, but them we get to keep doing that for new
>>> releases, and we have gratuitous extra copies of gcc sources and
>>>
Am 19.08.2013 17:27, schrieb Keith Packard:
> Wookey writes:
>
>> The alternative it to simply repack the existing linaro
>> cross-toolchain sources, but them we get to keep doing that for new
>> releases, and we have gratuitous extra copies of gcc sources and
>> corresponding differences between
Joey Ye writes:
> I'm not sure what blocked M0. There are a few things suspicious:
> * Which C library is used? The one gcc-arm-embedded works, and the only one
> I know works for Cortex-M, is newlib. Other than that, good luck :-(
I'm using pdclib, which is not the best solution in most ways ex
> -Original Message-
> From: Wookey [mailto:woo...@wookware.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 0:31
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; Embedded Debian
> Cc: Joey Ye
> Subject: Re: M0 and M3 patches in linaro toolchains
>
> +++ Matthew Gretton-Dann [2013-08-19
> -Original Message-
> From: Wookey [mailto:woo...@wookware.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 0:31
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; Embedded Debian
> Cc: Joey Ye
> Subject: Re: M0 and M3 patches in linaro toolchains
>
> +++ Matthew Gretton-Dann [2013-08-19
Wookey writes:
> The alternative it to simply repack the existing linaro
> cross-toolchain sources, but them we get to keep doing that for new
> releases, and we have gratuitous extra copies of gcc sources and
> corresponding differences between A* and M* toolchains/versions.
I'm working on this
+++ Matthew Gretton-Dann [2013-08-19 16:58 +0100]:
> On 19 August 2013 15:04, Wookey wrote:
> > Debconf13 (last week) considered the matter of bare-metal
> > cross-toolchains in Debian.
> > The linaro embedded toolchains
> > (https://launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/4.7/4.7-2013-q1-update) are
> >
On 19 August 2013 15:04, Wookey wrote:
> Debconf13 (last week) considered the matter of bare-metal
> cross-toolchains in Debian. Ideally we would have one toolchain source
> package from which the existing linux native compilers, and
> cross-compilers are built, including bare-metal cross-compiler
Debconf13 (last week) considered the matter of bare-metal
cross-toolchains in Debian. Ideally we would have one toolchain source
package from which the existing linux native compilers, and
cross-compilers are built, including bare-metal cross-compilers. There
is already mechanism for adding patches
12 matches
Mail list logo
