Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-07-01 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/01/2011 04:28 PM, Paul Larson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/01/2011 02:24 AM, Paul Larson wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel L

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-07-01 Thread Paul Larson
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/01/2011 02:24 AM, Paul Larson wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano > > wrote: > > > >> When all tests will be finished I wish to switch the new way test suite >

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-07-01 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/01/2011 02:24 AM, Paul Larson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > >> When all tests will be finished I wish to switch the new way test suite >> execution in lava, if it is possible. >> > Given that the old tests

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-30 Thread Amit Kucheria
On 11 Jul 01, Paul Larson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > > > When all tests will be finished I wish to switch the new way test suite > > execution in lava, if it is possible. > > > Given that the old tests are broken at the moment and disabled, any reason > we

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-30 Thread Paul Larson
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > When all tests will be finished I wish to switch the new way test suite > execution in lava, if it is possible. > Given that the old tests are broken at the moment and disabled, any reason we shouldn't switchover now? > Will the following

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-30 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/30/2011 01:04 PM, Paul Larson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > >> I added in attachment the result of these scripts on a fully working >> cpufreq framework on my intel box. That will show the ouput of the test

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-30 Thread Paul Larson
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > I added in attachment the result of these scripts on a fully working > cpufreq framework on my intel box. That will show the ouput of the tests. > > But the cpufreq is not complete on a pandaboard, so results won't be > really nice. > > Loo

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-30 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/30/2011 11:09 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 11 Jun 30, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> These tests are used to test the cpufreq driver on ARM architecture. >> As the cpufreq is not yet complete, the test suite is based on the cpufreq >> sysfs API export

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-30 Thread Paul Larson
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > These tests are used to test the cpufreq driver on ARM architecture. > As the cpufreq is not yet complete, the test suite is based on the cpufreq > sysfs API exported on intel architecture, assuming it is consistent across > architecture. >

Re: [RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-30 Thread Amit Kucheria
On 11 Jun 30, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > These tests are used to test the cpufreq driver on ARM architecture. > As the cpufreq is not yet complete, the test suite is based on the cpufreq > sysfs API exported on intel architecture, assuming it is consistent across > architecture. > > The different tes

[RFC pm-qa 0/2] tests for cpufreq

2011-06-29 Thread Daniel Lezcano
These tests are used to test the cpufreq driver on ARM architecture. As the cpufreq is not yet complete, the test suite is based on the cpufreq sysfs API exported on intel architecture, assuming it is consistent across architecture. The different tests are described at: https://wiki.linaro.org/Wo