On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> more thought. I also dropped Mark's change to append a device's name to
> a clk name since device tree might solve this neatly. Again more
> discussion around that would be good.
Some of that was for debugfs type stuff - if we en
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The goal of this series is to provide a cross-platform clock framework
> that platforms can use to model their clock trees and perform common
> operations on them. Currently everyone re-invents their own clock tree
> in
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The goal of this series is to provide a cross-platform clock framework
> that platforms can use to model their clock trees and perform common
> operations on them. Currently everyone re-invents their own clock tree
> inside plat
Hi all,
The goal of this series is to provide a cross-platform clock framework
that platforms can use to model their clock trees and perform common
operations on them. Currently everyone re-invents their own clock tree
inside platform code which makes it impossible for drivers to use the
clock AP
