On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > more thought. I also dropped Mark's change to append a device's name to > a clk name since device tree might solve this neatly. Again more > discussion around that would be good.
Some of that was for debugfs type stuff - if we end up providing information about the clocks via a diagnostic interface being able to distinguish between things in a textual fashion would be handy (and I'd guess the struct device may also be needed by any OF bindings to get at the bindings?). _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
