On 10 Oct 04, Sripathy, Vishwanath wrote:
> Kevin,
[snip]
> >
> > But this also makes me wonder, if we're going to clean this up, the bulk
> > of it could be re-written in C, with some inline asm helpers as needed.
> Probably yes. But as this code is specific to OMAP3, do you think it's
> worth
naro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3 PM: sleep code clean up
>
> On 10 Oct 04, Sripathy, Vishwanath wrote:
> > Kevin,
>
> [snip]
>
> > >
> > > But this also makes me wonder, if we're going to clean this up, the
> bulk
> > > of it could
Kevin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 1:35 AM
> To: Sripathy, Vishwanath
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3 PM: s
Vishwanath BS writes:
> This patch has done some clean up of omap3 sleep code.
> Basically all possible hardcodings are removed and code is Reorganized
> into more logical buckets for better readability and instrumentation.
>
> Tested on ZOOM3.
Again, please describe more about how it was tested
This patch has done some clean up of omap3 sleep code.
Basically all possible hardcodings are removed and code is Reorganized
into more logical buckets for better readability and instrumentation.
Tested on ZOOM3.
Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS
Cc: Kevin Hillman
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
--
From: Vishwanath BS
This patch has done some clean up of omap3 sleep code.
Basically all possible hardcodings are removed.
Reorganized code into more logical buckets for better readability.
Tested on ZOOM3.
Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S | 375
