> From: Mans Rullgard [mailto:mans.rullg...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 6:26 PM
Hi,
> >>> By the way, do you know whether it is safe to use "SCU Speculative
> >>> linefills" with Cortex-A9 r2pX and PL310 r3pX?
> >>>
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0407f/BA
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 27 November 2011 18:18, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>>
>>> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
>>> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans Rullgard
>>
>>> >> Do you have an erratum number for this?
>>> >>
>>> >
On 27 November 2011 23:36, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Mans Rullgard
> wrote:
>> On 27 November 2011 21:30, Siarhei Siamashka
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Woodruff, Richard
>>> wrote:
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailt
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Mans Rullgard
wrote:
> On 27 November 2011 21:30, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Woodruff, Richard
>> wrote:
>>>
From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans
On 27 November 2011 21:30, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>>
>>> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
>>> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans Rullgard
>>
>>> >> Do you have an erratum number for this?
>>> >>
>>
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>
>> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
>> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans Rullgard
>
>> >> Do you have an erratum number for this?
>> >>
>> > This was very recent BUG and not yet made it to the public
On 27 November 2011 18:18, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>
>> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
>> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans Rullgard
>
>> >> Do you have an erratum number for this?
>> >>
>> > This was very recent BUG and not yet made it to the public errat
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans Rullgard
> >> Do you have an erratum number for this?
> >>
> > This was very recent BUG and not yet made it to the public errata
> > numbers. Most likely next PL310 errata update should h
On 24 November 2011 12:38, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 11/22/2011 08:57 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Mans Rullgard
>>> wrote:
So keep them on by default but allow them to be t
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 08:57 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Mans Rullgard
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 November 2011 05:14, Shilimkar, Santosh
>>> wrote:
Mans,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 a
On 11/22/2011 08:57 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
On 22 November 2011 05:14, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Mans,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
These patches fix and tweak various cache settings for t
On 22 November 2011 12:57, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Mans Rullgard
> wrote:
>> On 22 November 2011 05:14, Shilimkar, Santosh
>> wrote:
OMAP4: enable double linefill on 4460
>>> Don't do that. We found a new errata around this recently which
>>> demanded
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 22 November 2011 05:14, Shilimkar, Santosh
> wrote:
>> Mans,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Mans Rullgard
>> wrote:
>>> These patches fix and tweak various cache settings for the 4460
>>> resulting in a speed increase exceeding
On 22 November 2011 05:14, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> Mans,
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Mans Rullgard
> wrote:
>> These patches fix and tweak various cache settings for the 4460
>> resulting in a speed increase exceeding 10% in some tests.
>>
>> Mans Rullgard (5):
>> OMAP4: apply L2 c
Mans,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> These patches fix and tweak various cache settings for the 4460
> resulting in a speed increase exceeding 10% in some tests.
>
> Mans Rullgard (5):
> OMAP4: apply L2 cache lockdown workaround only on 4460 ES1.0
This one is OK though t
These patches fix and tweak various cache settings for the 4460
resulting in a speed increase exceeding 10% in some tests.
Mans Rullgard (5):
OMAP4: apply L2 cache lockdown workaround only on 4460 ES1.0
OMAP4: enable double linefill on 4460
OMAP4: fix PL310 prefetch offset setting
OMAP4: s
16 matches
Mail list logo