On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:11:32AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37:48PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
> >> The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
> >> incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37:48PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
>> The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
>> incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt to idle to fail.
>>
>
> Does this have influence on current kern
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37:48PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
> The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
> incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt to idle to fail.
>
Does this have influence on current kernels or does this only trigger
with your cpuidle patches?
Sas
The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt to idle to fail.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c b/arch/ar
