Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> On 05/09/2012 01:53 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > amit kachhap wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mr Kukjin,
> >>
> >> Any comment or update about this patch?
> >>
> > I'm not sure we don't need to check the idle_time?
> > Others, looks ok to me.
>
> Hi,
>
> may be I misunderstood your qu
On 05/09/2012 01:53 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
amit kachhap wrote:
Hi Mr Kukjin,
Any comment or update about this patch?
I'm not sure we don't need to check the idle_time?
Others, looks ok to me.
Hi,
may be I misunderstood your question but the behavior is not changed
here, just the code is r
amit kachhap wrote:
>
> Hi Mr Kukjin,
>
> Any comment or update about this patch?
>
I'm not sure we don't need to check the idle_time?
Others, looks ok to me.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> Regards,
>
Hi Mr Kukjin,
Any comment or update about this patch?
Regards,
Amit Daniel
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Rob Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> On 04/25/2012 02:11 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch enables core cpuidle timekeeping and i
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 02:11 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> This patch enables core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and
>> remove those redundant parts from the exynos cpuidle drivers
>>
>> CC: Daniel Lezcano
>> CC: Robert Lee
>> Signed-of
On 04/25/2012 02:11 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
This patch enables core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and
remove those redundant parts from the exynos cpuidle drivers
CC: Daniel Lezcano
CC: Robert Lee
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 53 --
This patch enables core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and
remove those redundant parts from the exynos cpuidle drivers
CC: Daniel Lezcano
CC: Robert Lee
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 53 ---
1 files changed, 6 inser
