Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 05/09/2012 01:53 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > amit kachhap wrote: > >> > >> Hi Mr Kukjin, > >> > >> Any comment or update about this patch? > >> > > I'm not sure we don't need to check the idle_time? > > Others, looks ok to me. > > Hi, > > may be I misunderstood your question but the behavior is not changed > here, just the code is refactored and using a common routine where the > time is computed. > > The idle_time computation is done by the cpuidle core now if the > en_core_tk_irqen flag is enabled. That allows to remove a lot of > duplicated code across the cpuidle drivers. > OK, I see and checked. Daniel, thanks.
Amit, this looks ok to me, will apply. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
