On 12/19/2012 06:05 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 December 2012 09:55, John Stultz wrote:
So while I can try to update the linaro-android tree more frequently,
maintaining that tree is more of a background task. So when my other
commitments consume my attention, sometimes that update frequency i
On 5 December 2012 09:55, John Stultz wrote:
> So while I can try to update the linaro-android tree more frequently,
> maintaining that tree is more of a background task. So when my other
> commitments consume my attention, sometimes that update frequency is slower.
> Also, given we're already 3 r
On 5 December 2012 17:09, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Are you saying that cpufreq-interactive-gov would not be needed in this
> case? Thus excluding the case when someone wants the interactive governor,
> but without the rest of the android code. (I thought it was one of the
> reasons to have a sepa
05.12.2012 08:32, Viresh Kumar пишет:
On 5 December 2012 09:55, John Stultz wrote:
So while I can try to update the linaro-android tree more frequently,
maintaining that tree is more of a background task. So when my other
commitments consume my attention, sometimes that update frequency is slow
On 5 December 2012 09:55, John Stultz wrote:
> So while I can try to update the linaro-android tree more frequently,
> maintaining that tree is more of a background task. So when my other
> commitments consume my attention, sometimes that update frequency is slower.
> Also, given we're already 3 r
On 12/04/2012 08:10 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 December 2012 06:32, John Stultz wrote:
Ok, so I've taken the 3.7 rebase tree Anton did while I was on leave and
cherry-picked a number of newer changes from the AOSP/android-3.4 branch.
This should contain the latest AOSP cpufreq-interactive, io
On 5 December 2012 06:32, John Stultz wrote:
> Ok, so I've taken the 3.7 rebase tree Anton did while I was on leave and
> cherry-picked a number of newer changes from the AOSP/android-3.4 branch.
> This should contain the latest AOSP cpufreq-interactive, ion, and sync
> drivers.
>
> You can find i
On 12/04/2012 10:47 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On 12/04/2012 02:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
Any conclusion to this discussion? I'd really like the latest version
of interactive governor to be carried in all Linaro releases (Android
and Ubuntu). The one from the Android tree isn't the latest.
Sorry
On 12/04/2012 02:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Anton Vorontsov
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:30:03PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
[...]
How do you suggest to solve these issues?
That you, Andrey and
the 'the guy maintaining the Android topic'
Deepak, is th
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Anton Vorontsov
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:30:03PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> [...]
>> >>>How do you suggest to solve these issues?
>> >>
>> >>That you, Andrey and
>> >>the 'the guy maintaining the Android topic'
>>
>> Deepak, is that ^^^ John, Anton,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:30:03PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
[...]
> >>>How do you suggest to solve these issues?
> >>
> >>That you, Andrey and
> >>the 'the guy maintaining the Android topic'
>
> Deepak, is that ^^^ John, Anton, or someone else? :)
Same question. :)
I can easily pull branch
On 30 November 2012 19:00, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 02:23 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>
>> On 30 November 2012 15:22, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>>>
>>> But if they aren't different why do we need your version?
>
> To my understanding, having a separate topic for the interactive gover
On 11/30/2012 02:23 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 30 November 2012 15:22, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
But if they aren't different why do we need your version?
To my understanding, having a separate topic for the interactive
governor makes sense if some people need this governor, but do not want
On 30 November 2012 15:22, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 07:47 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> But if they aren't different why do we need your version? Thing is I not
> sure who the 'other guy' is who is maintaining the Android topic, it use
> to always be John Stultz but not su
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 07:47 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 29 November 2012 21:43, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>
> > Linaro's kernel tree already has an interactive governor which is
> > provided by the Android topic branch, so isn't trying to integrate
> > another version going to cause a lot of
On 29 November 2012 21:43, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Linaro's kernel tree already has an interactive governor which is
> provided by the Android topic branch, so isn't trying to integrate
> another version going to cause a lot of problems for whoever maintains
> the two versions and the person
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 20:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> This is more of announcement than a PULL request. :)
>
> Most of us are working with interactive governor. But most of us use
> a different version of it, as it is not yet mainlined and there is no hope
> of it getting mainli
Hi Andrey,
This is more of announcement than a PULL request. :)
Most of us are working with interactive governor. But most of us use
a different version of it, as it is not yet mainlined and there is no hope
of it getting mainlined.
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-kernel/2012-February/0
18 matches
Mail list logo
