On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 07:47 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 29 November 2012 21:43, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Linaro's kernel tree already has an interactive governor which is > > provided by the Android topic branch, so isn't trying to integrate > > another version going to cause a lot of problems for whoever maintains > > the two versions and the person having to merge them? > > Hi Tixy, > > I believe the version of patches in my tree are going to be almost same > to what is present in Android topic branch, and so shouldn't be much > issues there. > > If the two versions are different, then either i must update it or the > other guy.
But if they aren't different why do we need your version? Thing is I not sure who the 'other guy' is who is maintaining the Android topic, it use to always be John Stultz but not sure now. > That will guarantee that all are using same and latest > version of this governor. Is 'the latest version' the one in AOSP? > Over that it would be available for ubuntu also. But surely it is already available for Ubuntu because the Android topic branch is included in llct. E.g. if you boot a 12.11 Ubuntu image for vexpress and do cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors you will get: interactive ondemand performance > How do you suggest to solve these issues? That you, Andrey and the 'the guy maintaining the Android topic' get together and work it out :-) Of course, it could be that things go smoothly without any coordination. I just wanted to chime in and make sure that people knew that there could be issues, because these things have a nasty habit of cropping up a few days before a monthly release, when there is little time to fix and test things. -- Tixy _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
