, and uploaded with the addition of a tracking bug in the
changelog (to which you are now assigned).
http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686071
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http
):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1010.14
meta-source/debian/changelog |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Pulled, pushed, and uploaded.
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev
,
git fetch origin linaro
git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
.33 =>
2.6.35-22.34}/powerpc/powerpc-smp.modules (100%)
rename debian.master/abi/{2.6.35-22.33 =>
2.6.35-22.34}/powerpc/powerpc.modules (100%)
rename debian.master/abi/{2.6.35-22.33 =>
2.6.35-22.34}/powerpc/powerpc64-smp (100%)
rename debian.master/abi/{2.6.35-22.33 =>
2.6.35-22.34
On 10/11/2010 01:18 PM, John Rigby wrote:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
pushed and uploaded.
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman
rename debian.master/abi/{2.6.35-21.31 =>
2.6.35-22.33}/powerpc/powerpc-smp.modules (100%)
rename debian.master/abi/{2.6.35-21.31 =>
2.6.35-22.33}/powerpc/powerpc.modules (100%)
create mode 100644 debian.master/abi/2.6.35-22.33/powerpc/powerpc64-smp
rename debian.master/abi/{2.6.35-21.31 =
ards,
Is there any reason not to get these packages in universe ala Maverick?
I'm finding the Maverick packages to be real handy for cross compiling
ARM stuff, but Lucid will be around for a lot longer.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
On 09/29/2010 10:59 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:33:59AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
>> kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
>
>> fakeroot debian
fully found a way to override the architecture. Anyone
have any ideas? I've tried the various forms of
dh_gencontrol -p$(pkgimg) -a$(arch)
dh_gencontrol -p$(pkgimg) -- -a$(arch)
export DH_OPTIONS="-a$(arch)" && dh_gencontrol -p$(pkgimg)
rt
ailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Given the fact that Maverick is in freeze, and most of these patches are
feature additions, I think we're gonna let these patches go through the
Linaro tree.
Leann - d
gt; 2.6.35-1006.11}/armel/linaro-vexpress (100%)
> rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1005.10 =>
> 2.6.35-1006.11}/armel/linaro-vexpress.modules (99%)
> create mode 100644 debian.linaro/d-i/exclude-modules.armel-linaro-vexpress
uploaded
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 09/16/2010 06:29 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
uploaded
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listi
.git linaro
>
Pulled, but this commit is an egregious hack:
LINARO: [Config] workaround for kernel-wedge error on empty udebs
You're better off removing udebs from debian.linaro/d-i/package-list
then you are short cutting the copy and test step.
rtg
--
Tim Gard
flags);
> + pp->intr_mask |= PORT_IRQ_PHYRDY;
> + writel(pp->intr_mask, port_mmio + PORT_IRQ_MASK);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
> + }
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +
> static void ahci_port_intr(struct ata_port *ap)
> {
> void __iomem *port_mmio = ahci_port_base(ap);
> @@ -1670,6 +1855,7 @@ static void ahci_port_intr(struct ata_port *ap)
> if ((hpriv->flags& AHCI_HFLAG_NO_HOTPLUG)&&
> (status& PORT_IRQ_PHYRDY)) {
> status&= ~PORT_IRQ_PHYRDY;
> + account_alpm_stats(ap);
> ahci_scr_write(&ap->link, SCR_ERROR, ((1<< 16) | (1<< 18)));
> }
>
Yong Shen - is this patch faithful to the version released by Arjan?
Since its not upstream I can't really tell. Otherwise this patch looks
OK since accounting is not on by default. Note that statistics gathering
within the PHY interrupt handler could have an impact on throughput.
This is definitely a SAUCE patch since its not upstream, and is likely
to suffer some edits before acceptance.
Does Maverick have a version of powertop that uses any of these sysfs
entries?
Acked-by: Tim Gardner
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
mp;
#endif
};
+extern void update_pm_runtime_accounting(struct device *dev);
+
+
/*
* The PM_EVENT_ messages are also used by drivers implementing the legacy
* suspend framework, based on the ->suspend() and ->resume() callbacks common
This isn't a faithful backport of
8d4b9d1bf
On 09/08/2010 04:24 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
pushed and uploaded
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mail
ften wait for an archive admin to NEW the binaries after each
ABI bump anyways.
rtg
P.S. I'm out until Tuesday
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
1004.8}/armel/linaro-omap (97%)
> rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 =>
> 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-omap.modules (99%)
> rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 =>
> 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-vexpress (99%)
> rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 =>
>
On 08/26/2010 03:41 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
applied and uploaded
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mail
On 08/26/2010 08:38 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 03:40 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>> Tim,
>>
>> Here is the latest just before the freeze. I started with the
>> Ubuntu-2.6.35-19.25 merged linux-linaro-2.6.35 then rebased my
>> previous linaro packaging patche
irectories, but there were some missing changes to the debian
directory, e.g., 'UBUNTU: Pass DEB_MAINT_PARAMS to hook scripts'.
I'm fine with uploading this if you are sure its what you want. Have you
checked that it produces runnable images?
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonic
On 08/23/2010 07:37 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
pulled and uploaded
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mail
On 08/23/2010 10:10 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Tim Gardner
> wrote:
>
>>
>> You're kind of playing games with the ABI files for the new mx51 flavour,
>> but I uploaded anyways.
> So if I bump the ABI then I don't need ABI-
Looks like buildd borkage.
Original Message
Subject: [Build #1931878] armel build of linux-linaro 2.6.35-1003.7 in
ubuntu maverick RELEASE
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:40:11 -
From: Launchpad Buildd System
Reply-To: Launchpad Buildd System
To: tim.gard...@canonical.com
*
On 08/23/2010 07:36 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> Tim,
>
> The following changes since commit 951315de2583af8b51bf73ea284fdb8999f4f51c:
> Tim Gardner (1):
> UBUNTU: Linaro-2.6.35-1002.6
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>git://git.linaro.org/ubu
ng from
linux-linaro-meta to linux-meta-linaro.
2) The meta package binary names are changing from linux-linaro-image*
to linux-image-linaro*. Similarly for headers packages, e.g.,
linux-linaro-headers* to linux-headers-linaro*
If you are a consumer of Linaro ARM images _and_ you are plannin
Sorry, forgot to push.
On 08/18/2010 03:04 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> That is fine. Sorry for the confusion. I don't see your change in
> git anywhere?
>
> Thanks
> John
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Tim Gardner
> wrote:
>> On 08/16/2010 04:2
le in the git repository at:
>
>git://git.linaro.org/jcrigby/linux-meta-linaro.git master
>
> John Rigby (2):
>LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1000.1
>LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1001.2
>
> Tim Gardner (1):
>Dropped linux-source, linux-linaro-omap, linux-linaro-vexpress
xed with
'linaro-'. There are a couple of other commits having to do with getabi,
so you'll need to rebase.
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
maverick-meta.git. Note the
removal of meta packages linux-source, linux-linaro-omap, and
linux-linaro-vexpress.
linux-source does not exist, and linux-linaro-[omap,vexpress] are
redundant (though I know the master branch meta packages do something
similar).
r
The linaro branch, right? Cause thats what I'm about to upload.
On 08/12/2010 12:02 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> Sorry, I'll to a proper git request-pull in the future.
>
> On 08/12/2010 12:32 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> On 08/12/2010 08:16 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>>>
also done a linux-linaro meta package. It is in the master branch
> here:
> git://git.linaro.org/jcrigby/linux-linaro-meta.git
>
> Thanks
> John
From your linaro branch in
git://git.linaro.org/jcrigby/linux-linaro.git? A proper pull request
using 'git request-pull'
Original Message
Subject: [ubuntu/maverick] linux-linaro 2.6.35-1000.3 (Accepted)
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:01:32 -
From: Ubuntu Installer
Reply-To: Ubuntu Installer
To: Tim Gardner
linux-linaro (2.6.35-1000.3) maverick; urgency=low
[ John Rigby ]
* LINARO
h a couple of minor patches;
one to remove a 'Provides' statement, another to fix the linux-headers*
interdependencies. You should rebase against:
git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick.git linaro
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
_
34 matches
Mail list logo
