On 08/20/2010 08:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Tim Gardner<tim.gard...@canonical.com>wrote: > >> On 08/20/2010 03:20 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> sorry (Tim) for this mess, but its a ramp up thing and we finally agreed >>> what we really want. >>> >>> so we talked about our meta package naming and partly because of >>> infrastructural requirements from live-helper, but also partly because we >>> think its more consistent we would need the following changes to the >>> linaro >>> meta package naming: >>> >>> 1. Source: change to linux-meta-linaro >>> 2. Binaries: >>> Rename: linux-linaro-image-omap to linux-image-linaro-omap >>> Rename: linux-linaro-image-vexpress to linux-image-linaro-vexpress >>> 3. Headers: >>> Rename: linux-linaro-headers-omap to linux-headers-linaro-omap >>> Rename: linux-linaro-headers-vexpress to linux-headers-linaro-vexpress >>> >>> in this way the binaries/headers would be consistent with the current >>> "normal" naming scheme that is: linux-image-$flavour ... with flavour >>> being >>> "linaro-X" for everything that gets produced from linaro tree this cycle. >>>
The upshot of these change requests are: 1) The Linaro kernel meta package source name is changing from linux-linaro-meta to linux-meta-linaro. 2) The meta package binary names are changing from linux-linaro-image* to linux-image-linaro*. Similarly for headers packages, e.g., linux-linaro-headers* to linux-headers-linaro* If you are a consumer of Linaro ARM images _and_ you are planning an upgrade, then this _will_ affect you. If you are installing images from scratch after this change is implemented, then you're likely OK. This change will definitely require a change in the installer. rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
