Its bit early but will try to reach ARM office by 10.30.
Regards,
Santosh
Cell: +919845640191
From: Viresh Kumar [viresh.ku...@linaro.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:27 PM
To: Aneesh Kumar K.V; Shilimkar, Santosh; Vineet Gupta; Srivatsa S. Bhat
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> We have the cpuidle states pointer stored in the cpuidle device
> structure. This patch use this pointer instead of the driver's one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
Sorry for another comment on change log. Would be give a referenc
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
>
> This patch adds a pointer to the cpuidle_state array in the cpuidle_device
> structure. When the cpuidle_device is initialized, the pointer is assigned
> from the driver's cpuidle states array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
Wou
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> On 9 July 2012 16:37, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Vincent Guittot
>> wrote:
>>> On 9 July 2012 15:00, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Vin
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> On 9 July 2012 15:00, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Vincent Guittot
>> wrote:
>>> On 9 July 2012 12:55, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>>> Vincent,
>>>>
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> On 9 July 2012 12:55, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> Vincent,
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Vincent Guittot
>> wrote:
>>> Use cpu compatibility field and clock-frequency field of DT to
>>> es
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:25 +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> Having that support would greatly help for the SOC's which have not
>> yet
>> reached to stage where entire SOC is DT compliant and want to use
&g
Vincent,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> Use cpu compatibility field and clock-frequency field of DT to
> estimate the capacity of each core of the system and to update
> the cpu_power field accordingly.
> This patch enables to put more running tasks on big cores than
> on
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 02:58 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM, a0393909 wrote:
>>> Daniel,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM, a0393909 wrote:
> Daniel,
>
>
> On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a patch [1] to allow per
>> cpu latencies. We had a discussion about this patchset because it
>> reverse the modifica
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 11:55 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>
>> On May 1, 2012 1:46 PM, "Daniel Lezcano"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/01/2012 12:58 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>>
>>&g
On May 1, 2012 1:46 PM, "Daniel Lezcano" wrote:
>
> On 05/01/2012 12:58 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> On 04/24/2012 04:05 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset makes some cleanup on these cpuidle drivers
and consolidate the code across both architect
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Santosh, Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
> wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
>>> The changes are c
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 10:56 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>>>
>>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
It is used during the registration. This field has been very useful for
debug when need to disable a C-state etc.
So unless and until ther
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
> The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
> driver itself.
>
Thanks. Will have a look at your series.
> A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpui
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> arm registered cpufreq transition notifier to recalculate it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
> ---
Thanks for the OMAP updates
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> If CONFIG_SMP, cpufreq skips loops_per_jiffy update, because different
> arch has different per-cpu loops_per_jiffy definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
> Acked-by: Russell King
> ---
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar
___
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:19:23PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> + Peter Z
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 a
+ Peter Z
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 05:59:07PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> 2011/12/21 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>> > cpu hotplug is basically totally buggered - the preconditions placed
>> > upon the bringup code path are basically
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 27 November 2011 18:18, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>>
>>> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
>>> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans Rullgard
>>
>>> >> Do you have an erratum number for this?
>>> >>
>>> >
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 08:57 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Mans Rullgard
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 November 2011 05:14, Shilimkar, Santosh
>>> wrote
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 22 November 2011 05:14, Shilimkar, Santosh
> wrote:
>> Mans,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Mans Rullgard
>> wrote:
>>> These patches fix and tweak various cache settings for the
Mans,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> These patches fix and tweak various cache settings for the 4460
> resulting in a speed increase exceeding 10% in some tests.
>
> Mans Rullgard (5):
> OMAP4: apply L2 cache lockdown workaround only on 4460 ES1.0
This one is OK though t
> -Original Message-
> From: Bobby Batacharia [mailto:bobby.batacha...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:33 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks f
Bobby,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bobby Batacharia [mailto:bobby.batacha...@arm.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:08 AM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Santosh,
>
>
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Jon Callan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:10 PM
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Vishwa,
>
> I have a
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Amit Kucheria
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 2:27 PM
> To: Sripathy, Vishwanath
> Cc: Kevin Hilman; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 12:40 AM
> To: Sripathy, Vishwanath
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; Kevin Hillman
> Subje
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Amit Kucheria
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:26 PM
> To: Kevin Hilman
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] OM
Benoit,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Cousson, Benoit
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:56 PM
> To: vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org; Sripathy, Vishwanath
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lis
31 matches
Mail list logo
