ARMLT plan to stop making member builds

Hi folks, I plan to stop providing Member Builds for ARM, with 15.07 being the final release. The builds have been marked as deprecated for a while now. That means we will no longer provide these builds: http://releases.linaro.org/members/arm/openembedded/aarch64/latest/ http://releases.linaro.

Re: Problems detected in ARM Juno r1

o from the > HDMI1/2 available in the Juno r1 Board. > > By checking the device tree, I concluded that video is not supported for > now… Can you advise me about this subject? > > > > Thanks, > > Joao > > > > *From:* Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org] >

Re: Problems detected in ARM Juno r1

Hi Joao, I see from emails via another route that you've solved your problems by using updated software from Connected Community. For reference, the Linaro release that supports PCIe on Juno R1 is the "latest.xml" and "juno-oe" variant from this release: http://releases.linaro.org/15.05/members/

Updated Fastmodels available for Linaro employees/assignees

Hello Linaro employees/assignees, I've updated the Fastmodels binaries available for Linaro use. Visit the ITS page [3] for more details on filenames etc. for the download. FVP Base models are now at version/build 0.8.6302 from 18th Feb 2015. FVP Foundation and FVP VE models are now at build 9.2

ARM Trusted Firmware and UEFI for FVP models

Hello all, Just so you know, both ARM Trusted Firmware (TF) and UEFI have changed. The 13.03 release has TF code that is pre v0.3. Since v0.3, TF expects to load all other bootloader stages from a "Firmware Image Package" (aka FIP). This includes UEFI. Also, the upstream UEFI code for FVP has

Re: Issue while booting up VE board

On 11 March 2014 13:45, Tom Gall wrote: > Anyone with a VE board ever encounter something like this? > Sounds like a power supply problem. I'd contact supp...@arm.com for help. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Bibhuti Panigrahi > Date: Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:14 AM > Sub

Re: armv8 model memory

On 7 February 2014 02:19, Tom Gall wrote: > Thanks Victor! > > This doesn't bode well. > > I'm trying to debug a Chrome on armv8 build. Chrome loaded into gdb > with symbols is well over 1 Gig of memory. With everything else > running (as in my X env) things die pretty early due to lack of RAM to

Re: Problems with Foundation model running using a recent lamp image

I am not a >> > networking expert at all, so it is actually too much work figuring out >> > all >> > these details just to be able to use the model. >> > >> > Could you please let me know the set of commands you use to launch the >> > m

Re: Problems with Foundation model running using a recent lamp image

ions that I missing. I am not a > networking expert at all, so it is actually too much work figuring out all > these details just to be able to use the model. > > Could you please let me know the set of commands you use to launch the model > so that you can ping outside world and also do s

Re: Problems with Foundation model running using a recent lamp image

king setup information is available from ARM's website as linked from the release notes: http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/ I've never been happy with NAT networking, so I use a bridged setup. > > Thanks, > Anil > > > > > On 3 February 2014 22:03, Ryan

Re: Problems with Foundation model running using a recent lamp image

On 3 February 2014 13:38, Anil Singhar wrote: > Hi, > > I am running into problems with starting foundation model lately. > > 1. I had created an image using > > linaro-image-lamp-genericarmv8-20140127-635.rootfs.tar.gz > > 2. It was booting fine initially. > > 3. The problem started happening aft

Re: AArch64 toolchain status

On 31 January 2014 21:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday, January 31, 2014 07:21:02 Ryan Harkin wrote: >> On 30 January 2014 21:31, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > the simulator knows nothing of disk partitions and things like that. you >> > have >> > to manage

Re: AArch64 toolchain status

vide support > for running the Versatile Express models." > > Could that be the reason, the links are not working..? > No. > > Which HW pack and rootfs file did you use..? > > Thanks and Regards, > Anil > > > > On 31 January 2014 12:51, Ryan Harkin wrote

Re: AArch64 toolchain status

On 30 January 2014 21:31, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday, January 30, 2014 18:10:43 Anil Singhar wrote: > > I am using the following command to start the foundation model: > > > > > --- > > anils

Re: Problem with running foundation model

d release notes should give you all you need to get the image running: http://releases.linaro.org/latest/openembedded/aarch64/ Then there is the ARMv8 Engineering page, which is more of an overview: http://www.linaro.org/engineering/engineering-projects/armv8 > Thanks and Regards, > Anil >

Re: Problem with running foundation model

On 30 January 2014 12:45, Anil Singhar wrote: > I am facing a bug with starting the foundation model using the following > command > > anilss@anilss:~/Linaro/tools/ > Foundation_v8pkg/models/Linux64_GCC-4.1$ ./Foundation_v8 > --openembedded_lamp-armv8_20130719-403.img --network=nat > --network-na

Re: aarch64 fails to boot in model

On 16 January 2014 16:35, Tom Gall wrote: > Well I got it to boot. All I had to do was run the simulator as root. > From the perms in the dir on all the files shouldn't need to but o > well. > ​What?!? That's weird, you really shouldn't need root permissions to boot the model... ​ > > On Thu

Re: aarch64 kernel oops during mmap

On 16 January 2014 16:59, Tom Gall wrote: > Now on the real bit of fun that I want to get to the bottom of. > > This is from startx on the model. > > I have -C cache_state_modelled=0 set. Would that have an affect here? > ​No. This doesn't effect the functionality of the model. From memory,

Re: aarch64 fails to boot in model

On 16 January 2014 09:44, Milosz Wasilewski wrote: > On 16 January 2014 02:18, Tom Gall wrote: > > To add. Here's how I'm invoking the model: > > > > + /home/tgall/aarch64/FVP/models/Linux64_GCC-4.1/FVP_Base_AEMv8A-AEMv8A > > -C pctl.startup=0.0.0.0 -C bp.secure_memory=0 -C cluster0.NUM_CORES=4 >

Re: Anyone using virtio on armv7?

On 6 January 2014 22:37, Christopher Covington wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On 01/06/2014 05:27 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote: > > On 6 January 2014 20:26, Peter Maydell > <mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org>> wrote: > > > > On 6 January 2014 19:46, Ryan Harkin >

Re: Anyone using virtio on armv7?

On 6 January 2014 20:26, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 January 2014 19:46, Ryan Harkin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to fire up an ARM fastmodel using a virtio block device rather > > than the emulated MMC block device. > > > > UEFI is reading

Anyone using virtio on armv7?

Hello, I'm trying to fire up an ARM fastmodel using a virtio block device rather than the emulated MMC block device. UEFI is reading the kernel & DTB off the virtio device, so I know the device is present. I added this to my kernel config: diff --git a/linaro/configs/vexpress.conf b/linaro/conf

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

On 28 November 2013 09:05, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 November 2013 07:54, Ryan Harkin wrote: > > On 27 November 2013 19:13, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> Christopher is advocating that somebody should fix the boot > >> wrapper, so you have a single trivial .

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

On 27 November 2013 19:13, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 November 2013 18:27, Wookey wrote: > > +++ Christopher Covington [2013-11-27 11:17 -0500]: > >> In my opinion, the nicer solution is to port the semihosting boot > wrapper to > >> 64-bit. We've done that internally, but don't currently have

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

On 26 November 2013 21:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hi all, > > Do we have, or do we have plans for, an image that's based on Ubuntu > that's usable with the foundation model? The only part I don't know how > to do for myself is build the .axf file AXF is sooo unfashionable these days ;-)

Re: Running Linaro toolchain on ubuntu 13.10 x86_64

On 12 November 2013 06:25, Deepak Saxena wrote: > I'm working on getting my new build system up and running and with > 13.10. Running any of our toolchain commands leads to "No such file or > directory". I had exactly the same problem. > I'm guessing this has to with my system being x86_64 and

Re: Organizing Config Fragments

On 1 August 2013 18:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin wrote: >> > The vexpress defconfig has always been broken. >> >> ...maybe we could fix it? Not that we've had

Re: Organizing Config Fragments

On 1 August 2013 07:57, Andy Green wrote: > On 1 August 2013 14:11, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hi Andrey, >> >> linaro/configs/* is getting bigger and bigger, probably its the right time to >> organize it better for the future. There can be multiple things that we can >> do to avoid confusions of nam

Re: ARM versatile TC2 fails to boot

On 4 July 2013 11:33, Vijay Kilari wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 15:30 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >>> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 19:03 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> >With latest Linaro ARM kernel mentioned below

Re: ARM versatile TC2 fails to boot

Hi Vijay, On 3 July 2013 14:33, Vijay Kilari wrote: > Hi, > >With latest Linaro ARM kernel mentioned below fails to boot when > following configs are enabled > CONFIG_VEXPRESS_SPC & CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_TC2_PM > >OR > > Even just enabling CONFIG_VEXPRESS_PSCI and passing psci as kerne

Re: Couldn't locate release kernel sha key 0f66281a18ce706b4de2d4c208a852d358ecaf43

On 3 June 2013 09:17, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 13:19 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> Few of my ARM colleagues are facing issues in obtaining git tree for >> 13.03 release. >> They are referring: >> >> https://releases.linaro.org/13.03/android/vexpress >> >> f

Re: Search for technical support of Foundation Model

On 24 May 2013 08:17, Wang Wei wrote: > > Hi all, > >Now, we want to boot a specific operation system running on Foundation > Model. Because Foundation Model isa virtual platform incorporating an AArch64 > architecture >

Re: Help for Foundation model

On 21 May 2013 07:18, Wang Wei wrote: > Hi all, > > Foundation model is closed source propertiary software, but i want to know > how i can get more detailed and comprehensive technical support? It depends what support you want, but the Foundation Model is provided by ARM and as such, they should

Re: RTSM terminal_0 cannot display with linux-system-foundation.axf of linux-3.8

That's sort-of what's happening. If you look what's in our tree, it's basically mainline + the latest patches from Catalin's tree that aren't upstream yet + some config changes. That's the idea, at least. > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Ryan

Re: RTSM terminal_0 cannot display with linux-system-foundation.axf of linux-3.8

Hi, On 3 May 2013 10:08, Wang Wei wrote: > Dear linaro members > > I want to build arm64 kernel according to the steps of > HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel. Then i use Foundatin_v8 with args such as > linux-system-foundation.axf,vexpress64-openembedded_lam-armv8_20130320-274.img. > But RTSM terminal_0 c

[PATCH] Samsung/Arndale: fix RELEASE build with ARMLINUXGCC

The attached patch from Reece has already been applied to uefi-next as part of 13.02-rc5. But it's still open for review... 0001-Samsung-Arndale-fix-RELEASE-build-with-ARMLINUXGCC.patch Description: Binary data ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@li

Re: Add board config fragments to llct? (Re: Would like to add couple conf files to the config-boards-tracking branch)

On 15 November 2012 12:38, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On 11/15/2012 04:01 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote: >> OK, can we do it then? We're freezing for release today, > > > Are we? > https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1211/Release/Calendar?highlight=%28release%29|%2812.11%29 Doh! L

Re: Add board config fragments to llct? (Re: Would like to add couple conf files to the config-boards-tracking branch)

On 15 November 2012 11:37, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:20 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: >> On 11/14/2012 07:41 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote: >> > On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > [...] >> >> Now that the LT branches includ

Re: Add board config fragments to llct? (Re: Would like to add couple conf files to the config-boards-tracking branch)

On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > Adding linaro-dev list and replying with some comments... > On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 20:20 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >> The llct tree itself has no suitable .conf or defconfig for vexpress at >> all. That's the problem (wrt the ci jobs). >>

Re: Making countless kernel reboots painless on TC2

On 24 October 2012 09:29, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 22:56 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> I >> still recommend to read the following pages to get familiar with this >> beast: >> >> https://wiki.linaro.org/PawelMoll/BootingVEMadeEasy > >> https://wiki.linaro.org/ARM/Ver

Re: Query: Vexpress quick boot

I'm not understanding this email thread at all... perhaps because I've read it from the top ;-) I thought from the first email that Viresh was trying to get the board to boot up completely from when he applies power to the board in that case, editing /media/VEMSD/config.txt and changing "AUTO

Re: Call for topics for the 12.06 linux-linaro* trees

On 8 June 2012 13:25, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > There will be three linux-linaro trees this month. Also some LTs have > moved to 3.5, while the others will stay on older kernels. > > In addition to linux-linaro-core-tracking and linux-linaro ones > (described under https://wiki.lin

Re: FW: STM Drviers update patch

On 14 May 2012 14:46, Andy Green wrote: > On 14/05/12 21:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > Hi - > > > The commit to my clone was right after "config tilt stm and omap driver" >> on tracking-topic-stm. I used "git format-patch -1" to generate the >> patch. >> >> I sent my patch

Re: FW: STM Drviers update patch

keep > it easy to use for both cases. > > Regards, > Doug > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy Green [mailto:andy.gr...@linaro.org] > > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 10:29 PM > > To: Deao, Douglas > > Cc: inaro-...@lists.linaro.org; Ryan Harkin; Arn

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 28 March 2012 13:07, Andy Green wrote: > On 03/27/2012 04:48 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > > Is there a recommended way of generating a config fragment for a board? > > > > Currently, the vexpress config is quite large and its origin is unknown > > to the LT. If I remove

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

Hi John, On 26 March 2012 20:20, John Stultz wrote: >So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally > gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the > linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this for 12.04, and doing so > early so we can ma

Re: Linaro kernel tree for A15 for daily builds

On 26 January 2012 19:34, Scott Bambrough wrote: > On 12-01-26 01:24 PM, Dave Martin wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:33:35PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: >>> >>> HI. >>> >>> I'm building a LAVA service for running fast models. Quite soon (*) >>> we'll be ready to open an alpha access. Ri

[Fwd: Versatile Express hwpack changes]

Hi folks, The way Versatile Express hardware packs are to be delivered is set to change. Currently, both Platform and the ARM Landing Team (Tixy and me) generate hwpacks for Versatile Express A9. In future, only the ARM Landing Team will be generating hardware packs for the Versatile Express pla

Re: l-m-c hacking for UEFI

On 13 January 2012 10:09, Danilo Šegan wrote: > Hi Ryan, Guilherme, all, > > У чет, 12. 01 2012. у 17:35 -0300, Guilherme Salgado пише: >> >> I'm wondering... do you have any use cases for the none and all >> options? I don't have a use case for none, but it was easy to add and I considered it

Re: What kernel version will be in this months release?

On 12 December 2011 15:40, Angus Ainslie wrote: > Generally the landing teams can dictate what version is going into the release That's my understanding too. But is life always that simple? ;-) > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> 3.1 or 3.2? >> > > For 11.12, Ubun