Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-03-09 Thread Ming Lei
Hi Dmitry, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/23/2012 04:57 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> No, it doesn't work with upstream kernel now. You need to apply the >> patches[1][2] >> against upstream kernel to route CTIs IRQ so that OMAP4 PMU/pe

Re: Perf sched counters [Re: ARM A9 oprofile]

2012-03-01 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/28/2012 05:27 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> I am sure that several guys have tried the current omap4 pmu patch >> and make perf work well on pandaboard. > > > On a freshly booted panda board which is mostly i

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-28 Thread Ming Lei
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/28/2012 04:45 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> Please try the uImage on the link below: >> >>       http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~ming/up/uImage-3.3-rc5-perf >> > > No good news for the oprofile: OK, could

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-27 Thread Ming Lei
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/27/2012 06:27 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> After some check, I just found there is another patch you missed. >> Please try the attachment patch from Shilimkar, Santosh. >> >> If it doesn't work,

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-27 Thread Ming Lei
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/25/2012 07:24 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> BTW: suggest you to apply the recent arm pmu irq fix patches[1] to >> test 'oprofile'. >> >> [1], http://marc.info/?t=13300128495&r=1&w=2 &g

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-24 Thread Ming Lei
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/24/2012 01:44 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> Could you share us how you reproduced the problem? and which >> kernel are you used to reproduce it? > > > The kernel is Linus' tree (bb4c7e9a9908548b458f34a

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-24 Thread Ming Lei
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/23/2012 04:57 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> No, it doesn't work with upstream kernel now. You need to apply the >> patches[1][2] >> against upstream kernel to route CTIs IRQ so that OMAP4 PMU/perf can

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-22 Thread Ming Lei
that OMAP4 PMU/perf can work well. [1], http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=132686049213313&w=2 [2], http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132687938417894&w=2 thanks, -- Ming Lei ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-22 Thread Ming Lei
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/22/2012 02:57 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> I didn't use oprofile before and always use 'perf', and I am sure >> it works well with arm a9 pmu hardware on linus tree. > > > Should we consider opro

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

2012-02-22 Thread Ming Lei
ttp://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132687938417894&w=2 Hope the above can help you, :-) thanks, -- Ming Lei ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-10 Thread Ming Lei
7 select ARM_GIC select HAVE_SMP - select LOCAL_TIMERS if SMP + #select LOCAL_TIMERS if SMP select PL310_ERRATA_588369 select PL310_ERRATA_727915 select ARM_ERRATA_720789 thanks, -- Ming Lei ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev