Hi Dmitry,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dmitry Antipov
<dmitry.anti...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 04:57 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>
>> No, it doesn't work with upstream kernel now. You need to apply the
>> patches[1][2]
>> against upstream kernel to route CTIs IRQ so that OMAP4 PMU/perf can work
>> well.
>>
>> [1], http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=132686049213313&w=2
>> [2], http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132687938417894&w=2
>
>
> I'm not sure about "well" :-(:
>
> ...
> irq 34: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> ...
> Disabling IRQ #34
> irq 33: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> ...
> Disabling IRQ #33
Could you try the patch below to see if it can fix your oprofile problem?
In fact, I observed this patch can fix the same problem triggered
by the command below:
# frequency should be set as more than 40000
perf record -e cycles -F 50000 noploop
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
index d055abc..9c12bfa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static void __init omap4_configure_pmu_irq(void)
/*configure CTI1 for pmu irq routing*/
cti_init(&omap4_cti[1], base1, OMAP44XX_IRQ_CTI1, 6);
cti_unlock(&omap4_cti[1]);
- cti_map_trigger(&omap4_cti[1], 1, 6, 2);
+ cti_map_trigger(&omap4_cti[1], 1, 6, 3);
}
static struct platform_device* __init omap4_init_pmu(void)
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
