On 12 November 2013 05:49, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>
>> On 12 November 2013 06:25, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> > I'm working on getting my new build system up and running and with
>> > 13.10. Running a
ose have been dropped in 13.10.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ola
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>>
>> I'm working on getting my new build system up and running and with
>> 13.10. Running any of our toolchain commands leads to &
ependent 32 bit libraries?
Thanks,
~Deepak
--
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Working Group Lead
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http:/
ns(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
>
> _______
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
--
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Working Group Lead
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM
nk linaro-kernel should be part of the cc, but I don't think that
there is any policy in regards to not sending patches to linaro-dev. I see
lots of patches being posted on here and think it is a good place for
discussion.
Thanks,
~Deepak
--
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Working Group
this request? it's
>> already being used for Android 'stuff', see
>>
>> http://review.android.git.linaro.org/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Aquilina
>
> _______
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists
On 29 June 2012 12:44, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
> thanks for your review comments, i will post it on public branch,
Posting on a public branch once you have your git issues sorted is
good, but we want the patches themselves posted on the relevant email
lists. Please make the cleanups suggested and r
On 3 May 2012 07:04, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:50:35PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
>> and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
>> Connect in Hon
On 3 May 2012 06:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
> and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
> Connect in Hong Kong.
>
> One question that came up repeatedly is whether we should support all
On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote:
> All,
> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it
> here
> - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gid=0.
> Arwen is happy that that spreadsheet will
On 19 April 2012 12:58, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 14:47, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>>>> On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>>>>
On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>>> While we're planning for connect,
On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
>> with team tracks all together and just have topic tracks. This would
>> align with our topic based appr
== Deepak Saxena ==
=== Highlights ===
* Completed reviews!
* Worked with Kiko on Android Upstreaming patch tracking. Still have
mixed feelings
about whether every single patch needs to be tracked to help stay on top of
deliverables but will give it a try, might get some ideas on
different
On 10 April 2012 17:01, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 07:41 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
== Omar Ramirez ==
=== Highli
On 4 April 2012 09:54, Chris Simmonds wrote:
> On 04/04/12 11:53, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Chris Simmonds
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am working on behalf of an SoC vendor and I am trying to work out which
>>> (if any) of the many git trees at http://git.
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) and the Linaro Platform
Group are excited to announce the availability our February 2012
development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.3-rc3-2012.02-1
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our January 2012 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.2-2021.01-0
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our December 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.1-2011.12-1
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us delive
On 15 December 2011 06:27, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
>>
>> > Rather than me point each landing team at the patches, would you be able
>> > to cherry-pick the fixes from mainline please? They are:
>> >
>> > bce34d14
On 22 November 2011 22:46, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Thanks to the work of Angus and Tushar a second Landing Team has established
> a tracking tree, for Samsung Origen. They're using the same lt-tools
> management scripts I use to handle the various trees in TI Landing Team.
>
> As I mentioned
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our October 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.1-2011.11-1
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver
On 8 November 2011 14:10, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build
>> status of upstream builds ...
>
> FYI, the venerable ARM kautobuild run by Vin
Hi Michael,
I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build
status of upstream builds and have a few new comments on
the UIL
1) When there is a build failure, is it possible to have
the build link go directly to the build results?
It currently takes 3 clicks to get to
Thanks for this info Deepti. I'm assuming this is the same reason I
had issues logging into the summit scheduler.
~Deepak
On 31 October 2011 03:42, Deepti Kalakeri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OpenID plugin usage has been disabled in ci.linaro.org due to some
> vulnerability detected with the plugin.
> H
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our October 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.1-2011.10-1
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver
On 12 October 2011 09:25, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:10:59PM +0530, Deepti Kalakeri wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Also, what timezone is used to determine the date
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability of our September 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.0-2011.09-0
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us de
[Resend with update of l-a-k address in my alias to the correct
one on infradead].
A group of us met at Linux Plumber's Conf two weeks ago to
discuss struct clk and how we move forward with it. Several
of us had a follow up phone call last week, on Wed the 14th,
and what follows are meeting note
A group of us met at Linux Plumber's Conf two weeks ago to
discuss struct clk and how we move forward with it. Several
of us had a follow up phone call last week, on Wed the 14th,
and what follows are meeting notes from this follow up
discussion (I've seem to have lost the notepad on which I
too
Will this patch and the patch Tushar just posted apply
cleanly with each other? You are both touching mach-origen.c,
changing origen_devices, and adding support for video output
so it might be good in a future situations such as this to
post as one patch series with both of your sign-offs.
Thanks,
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability of our August 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.0-2011.08-0
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliv
Hi all,
I wanted to provide an update of what the kernel team accomplished at
Linaro Connect last week for those who were unable to attend.
The team was split into two main groups, the first being led by Grant
Likely and focusing on continuing the work on enabling Device Tree
support on ARM platf
On 5 August 2011 14:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> Deepak, Nicolas,
>
> On 07/27/2011 09:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>
>> To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
>> topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
>> investigated and/or accomplished. I'
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our July 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.0-2011.07-1
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver a
On 21 July 2011 16:47, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> Please let me know if you want to see something merged into the
>> linaro-3.0 tree before Thursday.
>
> So I'm working on merging this into the Android tree and something in
> your tree is causi
On 8 July 2011 12:50, john stultz wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:35 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 1 July 2011 12:14, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> > Each of the trees have various tags and branches based on how each
>> > team and developer
>> > works and I do
On 1 July 2011 12:14, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> Each of the trees have various tags and branches based on how each
> team and developer
> works and I don't want to ask folks to change what they are doing for
> their day to work.
> What I'd like to see is a a separate set of
On 1 July 2011 12:21, Andy Green wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
>> What I'd like to see is a a separate set of official trees that only
>> get updated with bits that
>> we are ready for non-Linaro developers to use, do not get rebased, and
>> get tagg
Hi all,
I was looking at git.linaro.org and I'd like to propose some consistency
in naming our git trees and in how we branch them. The main reason
for this from my perspective is to make it easy to point someone
from a partner team or from a partner''s customer to the git server and
have them qui
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our June 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-2.6.39-2011.06-0
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver
On 23 June 2011 11:39, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
>
>> When linux-linaro-3.0 is coming in the next weeks, we will use that as a base
>> instead as before.
>
> The base will be just as good as the contributions made by people to it.
> And besides a few notable exc
On 23 June 2011 08:51, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are planning
> to target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the moment. 2.6.39
> has some known issues like no onboard audio or HDMI audio, but since 3.0 has
> a new and be
On 14 June 2011 15:16, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
> Nico,
> Is there any dependency on the Toolchain WG?
> Does the latest kernel have to be built using the latest Toolchain release?
Good question. As we get the CI loop going, I imagine that we'll want the
kernel building with multiple tool chains th
On 2 June 2011 19:01, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>>> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
>>> in or should we plan on
On 1 June 2011 12:58, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:51:12PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> All official Linaro builds are generated from a single git tree that
>> has branches for different kernel versions that we build from being
>> automatical
On 1 June 2011 11:41, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> I seem to be hung up on having a way of saying "this hardware pack's
> kernel was built from this git tree with this config", so I wanted to
> explore the use cases a bit more:
>
> - My #1 use case is, once I've installed a hardware pack, r
On 30 May 2011 08:48, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 27 May 2011 11:45, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> On 26 May 2011 20:17, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> My only comment is on:
>>>
>>> What We're Not Doing
>>>
>>> Integrating graphics drivers
>>&
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our May 2011 development snapshot: linux-linaro-11.05-2.6.38
This is the first of a new monthly series of development snapshots from
the KWG that will provide a way for developers to work with the Linaro
kernels without
On 25 May 2011 03:29, Tixy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 19:42 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> The Kernel Working Group is getting ready to release the first of our new
>> monthly development snapshot in a few days and we would like folks
>> to do some quick sanity boot te
On 25 May 2011 04:18, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 07:42:43PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Kernel Working Group is getting ready to release the first of our new
>> monthly development snapshot in a few days and we would like folks
Hi all,
The Kernel Working Group is getting ready to release the first of our new
monthly development snapshot in a few days and we would like folks
to do some quick sanity boot testing on their boards. Please
grab or update the kernel from
git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.38.git,
and
On May 05 2011, at 16:46, David Gilbert was caught saying:
> On 5 May 2011 16:08, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> > David Gilbert writes:
> >> Not quite:
> >> a) Neon memcpy/memset is worse on A9 than non-neon versions (better
> >> on A8 typically)
> >
> > That is not my experience at all. On the contr
Hello all,
I want to introduce myself to the linaro-kernel and linaro-dev lists as I
just started at Linaro today in the role of Kernel Working Group Technical
Lead and will be working closely with all of you on enhancing the ARM Linux
ecosystem. I've been using Linux since 1993 and working with t
55 matches
Mail list logo
