On 8 November 2011 14:10, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Deepak Saxena wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build >> status of upstream builds ... > > FYI, the venerable ARM kautobuild run by Vincent Sanders was shut down a > while ago. > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/139303 > > This means there is now a real hole to fill. Given that Linaro's ci > infrastructure has more resources, it hopefully will be more useful too. > One thing that I didn't like much about kautobuild is that it only > coalesced all build results into a single report instead of having a per > config failure report sent to the appropriate maintainer. > > Should we try to advertise Linaro's plans more widely?
What I'd like to do is get this being used regularly by Arnd and also the TI maintainers first (as they've expressed some interest in it). Once that's up and running, we can reach out to other sub-architecture maintainers and figure out which trees/configs we want to build. I'd rather get the kinks sorted out with a small group than opening up to lots of people at once. ~Deepak > > > Nicolas > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
