Re: qemu crash

2014-03-10 Thread Tyler Baker
sorry for the confusion, I meant qemu-user :) On 10 March 2014 12:35, Daniel Lipsitt wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Peter Maydell > wrote: > > "beaglebone" here is a red herring, since QEMU doesn't > support that, only the beagleboard. > > > Hm, a while back Tyler Baker told me that yo

Re: qemu crash

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Lipsitt
On Mar 10, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > "beaglebone" here is a red herring, since QEMU doesn't > support that, only the beagleboard. Hm, a while back Tyler Baker told me that you could use QEMU with the beaglebone black. Maybe he meant qemu-user rather than qemu-system? Dan__

Re: qemu crash

2014-03-10 Thread Peter Maydell
On 10 March 2014 19:15, Daniel Lipsitt wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > Well, highbank does not support SD, but that's not your issue. Where's > your dtb and kernel? > > > It's inside the pre-built image here: > http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/ubuntu/highbank/ > >

Re: qemu crash

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Lipsitt
On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > Well, highbank does not support SD, but that's not your issue. Where's > your dtb and kernel? It's inside the pre-built image here: http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/ubuntu/highbank/ I'm not actually interested in highbank, I was just posting i

Re: qemu crash

2014-03-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Daniel Lipsitt wrote: > I sent the below to the list before I was a subscriber and I don't think it > made it through. > > - > > I don't know if I'm having a problem with QEMU or the linaro system image > I'm using or something else, so I'm posting it here. Let

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

2014-03-10 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Not sure there's much point looking very deeply into this. Java > > programs are threaded, threaded programs don't work under QEMU => > > don't try to run Java under QEMU :-) > > Having said that I'm sure there was another SIGILL related crash on

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

2014-03-10 Thread Peter Maydell
On 10 March 2014 11:28, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Peter Maydell writes: > >> On 9 March 2014 23:37, Dann Frazier wrote: >>> Also - I've found an issue with running OpenJDK in the latest upstream git: >>> >>> root@server-75e0210e-4f99-4c86-9277-3201ab7b6afd:/root# java >>> # >>> [thread 274902467056

Re: linux kernel flush_cache_all behaviour on a Big.LITTLE system

2014-03-10 Thread karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:44:05AM +, karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com wrote: >> I have two questions: >> >> 1- I was wondering what should be the expected semantics of >> "flush_cache_all" on a Big.LITTLE architecture. >> >> I can see that

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

2014-03-10 Thread Alex Bennée
Peter Maydell writes: > On 9 March 2014 23:37, Dann Frazier wrote: >> Also - I've found an issue with running OpenJDK in the latest upstream git: >> >> root@server-75e0210e-4f99-4c86-9277-3201ab7b6afd:/root# java >> # >> [thread 274902467056 also had an error]# A fatal error has been >> detecte

Re: linux kernel flush_cache_all behaviour on a Big.LITTLE system

2014-03-10 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:44:05AM +, karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com wrote: > I have two questions: > > 1- I was wondering what should be the expected semantics of > "flush_cache_all" on a Big.LITTLE architecture. > > I can see that the implementation of this function under linux kernel > is doi

linux kernel flush_cache_all behaviour on a Big.LITTLE system

2014-03-10 Thread karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com
Hello, I have two questions: 1- I was wondering what should be the expected semantics of "flush_cache_all" on a Big.LITTLE architecture. I can see that the implementation of this function under linux kernel is doing the following: a- Read the value of LoC ( level of coherency ) b- Flush each le

Re: Uboot Does NOT boot on Pandaboard-ES Rev B3

2014-03-10 Thread Dileep Katta
Thanks Sunyu. We are in the process of updating Linaro u-boot to v2014.01. Regards, Dileep On 10 March 2014 08:39, 孙钰 wrote: > Hi all, > > The uboot in the linaro-saucy-developer-20140222-647.tar.gz dose not > boot on Pandaboard-ES Rev B3 because the Modification of Elpida DDR2 > RAM > > Plea