On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 12:16 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> On 16/04/13 10:08, the mail apparently from Selina Kuo included:
> > Hi, John,
> >
> > Your assumption is right. The ump code is part of the out-of-tree mali
> > driver.
> >
> >
> > - Selina Kuo, one of Andy's colleagues ^^
>
> As Selina says
On 16/04/13 10:08, the mail apparently from Selina Kuo included:
Hi, John,
Your assumption is right. The ump code is part of the out-of-tree mali driver.
- Selina Kuo, one of Andy's colleagues ^^
As Selina says it's a code drop we got via Fujitsu from ARM for the OOT
Mali driver.
However
Hi, John,
Your assumption is right. The ump code is part of the out-of-tree mali driver.
- Selina Kuo, one of Andy's colleagues ^^
On 16 April 2013 07:50, John Stultz wrote:
> On 04/13/2013 03:22 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>>
>> On 13/04/13 09:07, the mail apparently from Andy Green included:
>>
On 04/13/2013 03:22 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 13/04/13 09:07, the mail apparently from Andy Green included:
I'm hoping someone else will write the patches ^^ but if not I'll try
to sort something out.
The attached series gets it building cleanly against current llct with
ION.
Cool. Althoug
Another thought what bout using arm based embedded systems?
On Apr 15, 2013 7:20 PM, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote:
> Wookey I'm trying to weigh all my options before going down the line of
> developing my own board
> On Apr 15, 2013 7:05 PM, "Wookey" wrote:
>
>> +++ Renato Golin [2013-04-15 16:24 +
Wookey I'm trying to weigh all my options before going down the line of
developing my own board
On Apr 15, 2013 7:05 PM, "Wookey" wrote:
> +++ Renato Golin [2013-04-15 16:24 +0100]:
> >On 15 April 2013 15:36, Jonathan Aquilina <[1]eagles051...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> > >It seems you wo
+++ Renato Golin [2013-04-15 16:24 +0100]:
>On 15 April 2013 15:36, Jonathan Aquilina <[1]eagles051...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
> >It seems you won't be using fancy 3D graphics, so the video card is near
> >irrelevant, here. You should be able to get accelerated 2D graphics with
> >mo
All i need is something that is decent performing to generate reports etc
as well as perform calculations. im totally not worried about graphics
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 15 April 2013 15:36, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>
>> My goal is to provide affordable point of
On 15 April 2013 15:36, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> My goal is to provide affordable point of sales systems. I was also
> considering some of the linaro dev boards that are available.
>
Hi Jonathan,
It seems you won't be using fancy 3D graphics, so the video card is near
irrelevant, here. You sh
I was also leaning toward the nvidia tegra 3. which i have used in my nexus
7 and im very happy with the performance but might be overkill for my
application or to develop my own board.
What are the specs of the current beaglebone board compared to the new one
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Ma
On 15 April 2013 15:35, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Serge Broslavsky [2013-04-15 15:11 +0300]:
>> On 13.04.13 08:26 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>> > As i have a project, that might do sufficiently running on a dev
>> > board, or even a custom developed arm based board.
>>
>> If you're trying to find
My goal is to provide affordable point of sales systems. I was also
considering some of the linaro dev boards that are available.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Serge Broslavsky [2013-04-15 15:11 +0300]:
> > On 13.04.13 08:26 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > > As i hav
+++ Serge Broslavsky [2013-04-15 15:11 +0300]:
> On 13.04.13 08:26 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > As i have a project, that might do sufficiently running on a dev
> > board, or even a custom developed arm based board.
>
> If you're trying to find some inexpensive ARM-based board for your
> p
correct. I worry that the raspi wont be powerful enough for instance to
generate reports of inventory so the business can make orders etc.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Dave Pigott wrote:
> POS as in Point of Sale?
>
> Dave
>
> On 15 Apr 2013, at 14:16, Jonathan Aquilina
> wrote:
>
> I was
POS as in Point of Sale?
Dave
On 15 Apr 2013, at 14:16, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I was considering the pi the question is though is it powerful enough to
> perform necessary calculations one might find in a pos system
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Serge Broslavsky
> wrote:
> Hel
I was considering the pi the question is though is it powerful enough to
perform necessary calculations one might find in a pos system
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Serge Broslavsky <
serge.broslav...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> On 13.04.13 08:26 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>
Hello Jonathan,
On 13.04.13 08:26 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> From my research I gather arm is just an architecture or chip producer as
> well? As i have a project, that might do sufficiently running on a dev
> board, or even a custom developed arm based board.
This is what Wikipedia (a gre
- bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-powerdebug/+bug/1014667
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat
---
display.c|4 +++-
powerdebug.c |2 +-
regulator.c |4 +++-
tree.c |4 +++-
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/display.c b/display.c
inde
- handle winch to display window properly
- bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-powerdebug/+bug/827828
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat
---
display.c|5 +
powerdebug.c |4
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/display.c b/display.c
index 39a8e71..e9f4bf6 100644
) rebuild has just been
published, the tag is llct-20130411.0.
The next step is:
April 12: ll rebuild based on llct-20130411.0.
- done
v3.9-rc7 is out. So the next two steps are:
April 15: v3.9-rc7 based linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) rebuild
April 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20130415
The last
20 matches
Mail list logo
