On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 12:16 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 16/04/13 10:08, the mail apparently from Selina Kuo included: > > Hi, John, > > > > Your assumption is right. The ump code is part of the out-of-tree mali > > driver. > > > > > > - Selina Kuo, one of Andy's colleagues ^^ > > As Selina says it's a code drop we got via Fujitsu from ARM for the OOT > Mali driver. > > However that code is all GPL2, as it should be.
I assume it's not for as yet unreleased IP and under NDA or anything. (Just thought I would throw that in there.) > I think any of the options are good, > > - make our own repo and keep it in sync with llct > > - privately encourage ARM to keep it in sync with Linus' HEAD, publicly > > - upstream it so it's always in sync > > This obviously helps of all LT who want to / can harmonize their tree on > llct basis. > > Tushar, do you have any opinion? > > Anyone who dealt with this code or at ARM (Tixy?) I've never dealt with this code but one thing occurs to me: how would you manage the user side binary blob? If different members have different versions of the blobs (or have tweaked them) are they all going to work with a common version of the kernel driver or have different members tweaked things for there own needs? -- Tixy _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
