Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 13.01

2013-01-21 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Greetings, The llct and ll have been updated to v3.8-rc4. The tags are llct-20130121.1 and ll-20130122.0 respectively. Some more details are here: http://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule Unless there would be a strong reason, for the 13.01 ll will remain on llct-20

Re: arm 0-day kernel builders?

2013-01-21 Thread Andy Doan
On 01/20/2013 08:57 AM, Rob Clark wrote: Btw, not sure if any of you have seen the 0-day kbuild setup that intel has.. https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild runs various builds for different archs on every commit with different configs, randconfig, etc. And various checks with sparse,

Re: arm 0-day kernel builders?

2013-01-21 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:11 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On 01/20/2013 06:57 AM, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> Btw, not sure if any of you have seen the 0-day kbuild setup that intel >> has.. >> >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild >> >> runs various builds for different archs on every commit wi

Re: arm 0-day kernel builders?

2013-01-21 Thread John Stultz
On 01/20/2013 06:57 AM, Rob Clark wrote: Btw, not sure if any of you have seen the 0-day kbuild setup that intel has.. https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild runs various builds for different archs on every commit with different configs, randconfig, etc. And various checks with sparse,

Re: [PATCH] arm64: vexpress: Select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB for PLAT_VEXPRESS

2013-01-21 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi Tixy, On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:04:38PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > Patch 25c92a37a (arm64: Always select ARM_AMBA and GENERIC_GPIO) > expects platforms to have GPIO so we need to make sure vexpress > always has this by selecting ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB. > > Without this change drivers l

Re: Question regarding broadcast timer/cpuidle and /proc/interrupts

2013-01-21 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 01/21/2013 03:38 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2013 07:47 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I have a question regarding the behavior of cpuidle on pandaboard. >> >> 1. cpuidle is enabled >> >> 2. The deep idle states seem to be reach >> >> for i in $(find /sys/d

Re: Question regarding broadcast timer/cpuidle and /proc/interrupts

2013-01-21 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 21 January 2013 07:47 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Hi All, I have a question regarding the behavior of cpuidle on pandaboard. 1. cpuidle is enabled 2. The deep idle states seem to be reach for i in $(find /sys/devices/system/cpu -name "usage"); do echo "$i : $(cat $i)"; done /sys/devi

Question regarding broadcast timer/cpuidle and /proc/interrupts

2013-01-21 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Hi All, I have a question regarding the behavior of cpuidle on pandaboard. 1. cpuidle is enabled 2. The deep idle states seem to be reach for i in $(find /sys/devices/system/cpu -name "usage"); do echo "$i : $(cat $i)"; done /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state0/usage : 7049 /sys/devices

[PATCH] clk: allow reparenting of a clock to the orphan list

2013-01-21 Thread Rajagopal Venkat
Allow reparenting of a clock(multiple and single parent) to the orphan list when new parent clock is NULL. Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 18 -- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index e