Re: Linaro Release 12.09 Postmortem Summary

2012-10-05 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:36 PM, David Zinman wrote: > Postmortem and lessons learned for Linaro's release 2012.09 > > https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1209/Release/Review Is there any specific reason why we're missing the postmortem for so many teams? Cheers, -- Ricardo Salveti de Araujo ___

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Ricardo Salveti
t;> Yes, this makes sense. >>> Would the following plan be OK: >>> ( should normally be 0, but may be a small positive number) >>> * till the end of this week please use llct-20121004.0 as the base for >>> the linux-linaro (ll) topics >>> * October 9:

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Andrey Konovalov
build based on llct-20121005. * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012. * October 23: ll rebuild based on llct-20121019., ll code freeze (no massive ll topics updates after that; bugfixes only) Is this month following the normal release cycle? If so, isn't the release day Oct 24th, a

Linaro Release 12.09 Postmortem Summary

2012-10-05 Thread David Zinman
Postmortem and lessons learned for Linaro's release 2012.09 https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1209/Release/Review Highlights and Key Successes The 12.09 release cycle saw some early work on minimal ARMv8 bootstrap, with a very minimal rootfs to help other developers t

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
e end of this week please use llct-20121004.0 as the base for > >> the linux-linaro (ll) topics > >> * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121005. > >> * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012. > >> * October 23: ll rebuild based on llct-20121019., ll code f

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Andrey Konovalov
sense. Would the following plan be OK: ( should normally be 0, but may be a small positive number) * till the end of this week please use llct-20121004.0 as the base for the linux-linaro (ll) topics * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121005. * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012. * Octob

sched: modify timer and workqueue framework to allow migration

2012-10-05 Thread Viresh Kumar
Hi Guys, I have been working on this activity since some time and V2 of patches is up for review over kernel mailing list. If any of us is interested in using these patches, can pick them from: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sched-timer-wq-migration-v

Re: Query: Vexpress quick boot

2012-10-05 Thread Bernard Ogden
Glad you got what you wanted :) Looks like something odd is going on with the red button, though. I'll let the platforms folk know. Regards, Bernie On 5 Oct 2012, at 04:43, "Viresh Kumar" wrote: > On 4 October 2012 21:26, Ryan Harkin wrote: >> I'm not understanding this email thread at all.

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Tushar Behera
ur LT branches off? >> >> Yes, this makes sense. >> Would the following plan be OK: >> ( should normally be 0, but may be a small positive number) >> * till the end of this week please use llct-20121004.0 as the base for >> the linux-linaro (ll) topics >>

Re: Planning topcs for inclusion in linux-linaro

2012-10-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
; Would the following plan be OK: > ( should normally be 0, but may be a small positive number) > * till the end of this week please use llct-20121004.0 as the base for > the linux-linaro (ll) topics > * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121005. > * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-201

LAVA down time

2012-10-05 Thread Dave Pigott
Hi All, Finally, after months of delays, our leased line is stable and usable. I have the router configured and ready to switch over, which I plan to do on Monday. As a consequence, I will be putting all the boards in LAVA offline on Sunday morning (UK time). Currently running jobs will be allo