Re: Virtual Keyboard Issue

2012-06-18 Thread Bharathi Subramanian
Thanks Vishal. Initially I misunderstood your statement and trying to use the Keyboard related APK from ICS Build. But later, I found the "icskeyboard.apk" file and loaded it. Now Android Virtual Keyboard is working fine. Thanks, -- Bharathi Subramanian On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Vishal Bho

Re: [Linaro-validation] Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Andy Green writes: > On 06/19/12 11:04, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: >> Andy Green writes: >> >>> On 06/19/12 09:45, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: Paul Larson writes: >>> > One thing I was thinking, is whether we could munge the boot

Re: [Linaro-validation] Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Andy Green
On 06/19/12 11:04, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: Andy Green writes: On 06/19/12 09:45, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: Paul Larson writes: One thing I was thinking, is whether we could munge the boot script when we install it to this parti

Re: [Linaro-validation] Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Andy Green writes: > On 06/19/12 09:45, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: >> Paul Larson writes: > >>> One thing I was thinking, is whether we could munge the boot script when we >>> install it to this partition and replace the paths in some automagic way. >>> This would so

Re: [Linaro-validation] Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Andy Green
On 06/19/12 09:45, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: Paul Larson writes: One thing I was thinking, is whether we could munge the boot script when we install it to this partition and replace the paths in some automagic way. This would solve the issue of making sure we alw

Re: [Linaro-validation] Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Paul Larson writes: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle < > michael.hud...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> Paul Larson writes: >> >> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < >> > marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > >> >> W dniu 18.06.2012 15:02, YongQin Liu pisz

Re: [Linaro-validation] Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Paul Larson
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@linaro.org> wrote: > Paul Larson writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < > > marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >> W dniu 18.06.2012 15:02, YongQin Liu pisze: > >> > Hi, Saugata > >> > > >>

Re: [Linaro-validation] Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Paul Larson writes: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < > marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> W dniu 18.06.2012 15:02, YongQin Liu pisze: >> > Hi, Saugata >> > >> > We have a problem to use the mmcblk0p8 partition, do you know if we >> > can use it, and how can we use i

Re: Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Amit Pundir
On 18 June 2012 19:54, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 18.06.2012 16:20, Paul Larson pisze: > > > It's worked for us so far, but it's been tight on the lava side due > > to the number of partitions that android wants, and especially with > > the annoying hardcoded partition numbers that android

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/18/2012 08:15 PM, Colin Cross wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: >> I propose to host a cpuidle-next tree where all these modifications will >> be and where people can send patches against, preventing last minutes >> conflicts and perhaps Lenb will agree to pul

Re: Thank you Chengjie

2012-06-18 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Looks like Chengjie's .net address hasn't been set up yet ;) On 18 June 2012 13:49, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Hey all, > > Today is Chengjie's last day as a Linaro assignee. I'd like to thank > him for his great work on the Linaro Android team over the last 6 > months. He has had a big hand in s

Thank you Chengjie

2012-06-18 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Hey all, Today is Chengjie's last day as a Linaro assignee. I'd like to thank him for his great work on the Linaro Android team over the last 6 months. He has had a big hand in supporting Origen and improving test automation. Chengjie is still keen on helping Linaro. He will transition to a commu

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Colin Cross
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > I propose to host a cpuidle-next tree where all these modifications will > be and where people can send patches against, preventing last minutes > conflicts and perhaps Lenb will agree to pull from this tree. In the > meantime, the tree will

Re: Merge tmp.perf/core branch

2012-06-18 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Hi Dmitry, On 06/18/2012 04:19 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: Andrey, can we merge it into official Linaro tree(s)? New topic perf has been added to linux-linaro-core-tracking. Thanks, Andrey This is going to mainline anyway, but there are some requests to get perf updates faster than Ingo can

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/18/2012 01:54 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: > > On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > >> > >> Dear all, > >> > >> A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a patch [1] to allow per > >> cpu latencies. We had a di

Re: Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 18.06.2012 16:20, Paul Larson pisze: > It's worked for us so far, but it's been tight on the lava side due > to the number of partitions that android wants, and especially with > the annoying hardcoded partition numbers that android uses. I do wonder why Linaro Android team did not tried

Re: Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Paul Larson
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: > W dniu 18.06.2012 15:02, YongQin Liu pisze: > > Hi, Saugata > > > > We have a problem to use the mmcblk0p8 partition, do you know if we > > can use it, and how can we use it? > > > > I created the 8th par

Re: Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 18.06.2012 15:02, YongQin Liu pisze: > Hi, Saugata > > We have a problem to use the mmcblk0p8 partition, do you know if we > can use it, and how can we use it? > > I created the 8th partition with fdisk command and the 8th partition > is listed in the output of fdisk -l command but it is

Re: [linux-pm] cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread a0393909
Daniel, On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Dear all, A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a patch [1] to allow per cpu latencies. We had a discussion about this patchset because it reverse the modifications Deepthi did some months ago [2] and we may want to provide a differe

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/18/2012 03:06 PM, Jean Pihet wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: >> On 06/18/2012 02:53 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 06/18/2012 01:54 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: > On

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Jean Pihet
Hi Daniel, On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/18/2012 02:53 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> On 06/18/2012 01:54 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >

Can we use mmcblk0p8?

2012-06-18 Thread YongQin Liu
Hi, Saugata We have a problem to use the mmcblk0p8 partition, do you know if we can use it, and how can we use it? I created the 8th partition with fdisk command and the 8th partition is listed in the output of fdisk -l command but it is not listed in /proc/partitions file, even after reboot And

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/18/2012 02:53 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 06/18/2012 01:54 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: >>> On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> Dear all, A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a pa

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/18/2012 01:54 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: > On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> >> Dear all, >> >> A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a patch [1] to allow per >> cpu latencies. We had a discussion about this patchset because it >> reverse the modifications Deepthi did

Merge tmp.perf/core branch

2012-06-18 Thread Dmitry Antipov
Andrey, can we merge it into official Linaro tree(s)? This is going to mainline anyway, but there are some requests to get perf updates faster than Ingo can accept them. Dmitry Original Message Subject: [RFC] tmp.perf/core branch with event_name changes and some more Date: Tu

Re: cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Deepthi Dharwar
On 06/18/2012 02:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > Dear all, > > A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a patch [1] to allow per > cpu latencies. We had a discussion about this patchset because it > reverse the modifications Deepthi did some months ago [2] and we may > want to provide a dif

cpuidle future and improvements

2012-06-18 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Dear all, A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a patch [1] to allow per cpu latencies. We had a discussion about this patchset because it reverse the modifications Deepthi did some months ago [2] and we may want to provide a different implementation. The Linaro Connect [3] event bring us

android-build.linaro.org planned downtime

2012-06-18 Thread Deepti Kalakeri
Hi All, Infrastructure team fixed a jenkins issue reported in the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ci/+bug/959945. The patched jenkins including the fix has been tested for more than a week on ci.linaro.org successfully. In order to deploy the fix we need to take https://android-build.linaro.