Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> writes: > On 06/19/12 11:04, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: >> Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> writes: >> >>> On 06/19/12 09:45, the mail apparently from Michael Hudson-Doyle included: >>>> Paul Larson <paul.lar...@linaro.org> writes: >>> >>>>> One thing I was thinking, is whether we could munge the boot script when >>>>> we >>>>> install it to this partition and replace the paths in some automagic way. >>>>> This would solve the issue of making sure we always have the latest >>>>> bootargs and dtb files for booting, and get us one step closer to parity >>>>> with a manually imaged system. >>>> >>>> Yeah, I've thought about that a bit too. One problem at a time :-) (and >>>> hopefully sdmux will happen and we can forget about this whole issue). >>> >>> Have we given up on Lava ever supporting / testing non-SD boot paths, or >>> is that going to be supported by this sdmux implementation? >> >> No, we have not given up -- although it's not a focus of current work -- >> and no, it is not going to be supported by this sdmux implementation. > > So if I understood, it's not supported and there is no plan to support it.
Correct. Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
