Hi Robert,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:50:23PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
> Cleanup up imx5 idle code and enable imx5 low powe idle for imx53.
>
> Add common imx cpuidle initialization functionality and add a i.MX5 and i.MX6Q
> platform cpuidle implementation.
The series looks good now. We can take
Just wanted to share an update. I got an SD mux card in the mail
yesterday that we've been talking about for LAVA. This device can allow
LAVA to work without having to use the master images we've all grown to
dislike. Its also nice for personal use because you aren't swapping out
SD cards all d
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> Assuming we want to do this, would we really make a -lava variant? Why
>> not include the tests in the LEB directly? Android already ships the
>> tests in the image, so it wouldn't be something ent
On Thursday 24 May 2012, John Stultz wrote:
> Yep. Good call, that's the one! Reverting it works for me.
> Thanks for catching that. After a few hours of bisecting I had gone a
> bit braindead. :)
>
> Playing around with the patch, it looks like its the irq assignment
> thats causing problems
Hey Arnd, Rob,
So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm
now trying to sort out the following HDMI failure I'm seeing w/ the
current 3.5-rc with my Panda Board.
[2.973693] omapdss error: HPD IRQ request failed
[2.978759] omapdss HDMI error: failed to power o
On 05/24/2012 06:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2012, John Stultz wrote:
On 05/23/2012 05:05 PM, John Stultz wrote:
Hey Arnd,
So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with
Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree,
the boot fails aft
Good day all,
A new set of startup files have been released [1]. As with uboot, the
statup files reside in the boot sector on the emmc card and as such
requires the usage of riff for the update.
Instructions to update the startup files for Android can be found here [2].
This new set provides:
.
On 5/1/2012 7:47 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
Add nodes for mailbox DT, to interface with hwmods.
Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna
Acked-by: Benoit Cousson
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi |5 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi |5 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi |5 +
On 5/2/2012 7:42 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Omar,
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you
had proposed earlier [1
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> GCC Explorer.. on ARM?
>
> http://xania.org/201205/gcc-explorer
>
> Could we get Matt to provide a cross-compiler environment too? He's
> already using gcc-linaro anyway.. ;-)
It seems his version on gcc.godbolt.org already supports a ARM
cross-compiler; the
On 24 May 2012 16:11, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> http://xania.org/201205/gcc-explorer
>
> Could we get Matt to provide a cross-compiler environment too? He's
> already using gcc-linaro anyway.. ;-)
He appears to provide a 4.5 version of our cross-compiler environment
? Click on "compiler
http://xania.org/201205/gcc-explorer
Could we get Matt to provide a cross-compiler environment too? He's
already using gcc-linaro anyway.. ;-)
We could also host a version ourselves under a cool linaro.org hostname.
--
Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP
Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 64
On 24/05/12 09:11, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 05/23/2012 05:25 PM, Andy Green wrote:
On 24/05/12 06:42, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Am I right in thinking the issue you're running into here is that your
customer has direct expectations for the tree you're main
Hello Guodong, Torben,
I tried the mfg-tool release and basically it works. However, the NOR to SD
loader binary is not included and also not the boot option. So you have to
modify the ucl.xl [1], to match your needs. I can check my own profile and try
to prepare one especially for Linaro-SD
On Thursday 24 May 2012, John Stultz wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 05:05 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > Hey Arnd,
> > So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with
> > Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree,
> > the boot fails after not finding the root device
On Wed, May 23, 2012, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Assuming we want to do this, would we really make a -lava variant? Why
> not include the tests in the LEB directly? Android already ships the
> tests in the image, so it wouldn't be something entirely new.
+1; the test helpers should just be installed
On 24 May 2012 18:03, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
> > As some of you know, we had a problem today which caused all android
> > tests to fail in LAVA. This is now fixed (basically, the version of adb
> > we had installed in the lab was t
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> As some of you know, we had a problem today which caused all android
> tests to fail in LAVA. This is now fixed (basically, the version of adb
> we had installed in the lab was too old), and if you need to you should
> be safe to resu
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Alexander Sack writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Deepti Kalakeri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, John Rigby wrote:
I believe from experience on a local host that having a precloned tree
Hello,
On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:42:59 +0200
Alexander Sack wrote:
[]
>
> remember that our http: proxy is set up in a way that it should not
> make much of a diff...
>
> The thing is that we have to transfer a complete linux tree to the
> slave node no matter what.
>
> Whether you --reference s
20 matches
Mail list logo
