Re: No group tracks at Connect

See my earlier email. They can be different or the same it's up to you... Dave Sent from my iPad On 25 Apr 2012, at 05:50, Arwen Donaghey wrote: > All, > > My understanding was the session lead is not necessarily the champion. The > champion is the 'guru' or 'owner' of the topic, and the

Re: No group tracks at Connect

Champion arranges the meeting the session lead runs it, they can be the same person Dave Sent from my iPad On 24 Apr 2012, at 23:17, Deepak Saxena wrote: > On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote: >> All, >> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it >>

Re: Linaro U-Boot 12.04 released

On 24.04.2012 17:50, John Rigby wrote: Version 12.04 of Linaro U-Boot has been released. Looking at the below git, it looks like the plain U-Boot release v2012.04 is used as a base for this? If so, this isn't a good idea because this is known to be broken: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-b

Re: No group tracks at Connect

All, My understanding was the session lead is not necessarily the champion. The champion is the 'guru' or 'owner' of the topic, and the session lead is exactly that… the session lead. There are a number of sessions covering various areas of one topic potentially? Please do correct me if this i

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

On 04/25/2012 11:12 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> We're still undergoing uplevel on tilt-tracking and didn't get back to >> tilt-3.3 functionality yet (OMAP4 boot is busted, although hopefully we >> have a fix for that today), so I put off this common config thing. >> >> Howeve

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Andy Green wrote: > On 04/25/2012 03:43 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > Hi Andrey - > >> I've just created linux-linaro-core-tracking branch in >> git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git. >> It is based on mainline tip, and has all

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

On 04/25/2012 03:43 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi Andrey - > I've just created linux-linaro-core-tracking branch in > git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git. > It is based on mainline tip, and has all the Platform and Working Groups > topics which would appear i

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Deepak Saxena wrote: > On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote: >> All, >> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it >> here >> - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0a

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

On 25 April 2012 03:51, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:40:35AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: >> Thanks for the attention on this.  From what I've understood, I will >> send another submission that includes the imx cpuidle patchset and >> Shawn's device tree late initcall patc

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On 25 April 2012 03:47, Deepak Saxena wrote: > On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote: >> All, >> I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it >> here >> - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gi

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling wrote: > All, > I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it > here > - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gid=0. >     Arwen is happy that that spreadsheet will

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:40:35AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > Thanks for the attention on this. From what I've understood, I will > send another submission that includes the imx cpuidle patchset and > Shawn's device tree late initcall patchset and I'll provide > explanation of the two separate patchs

linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

Greetings, I've just created linux-linaro-core-tracking branch in git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git. It is based on mainline tip, and has all the Platform and Working Groups topics which would appear in the next linux-linaro kernel release. No topics from the Landing Teams

Linaro U-Boot 12.04 released

Version 12.04 of Linaro U-Boot has been released. Details on Launchpad here: https://launchpad.net/u-boot-linaro/trunk/12.04 And on git.linaro.org here: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/Linaro-u-boot-2012.04 >From the release notes: This releas

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:38:43AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: >> > > >> Let me try last time.  What about havi

[PATCH 17/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3/4: consolidate cpuidle Makefile

Define a CPU_IDLE section in the makefile, declare the functions in the header files conforming to the kernel coding rules and remove the 'define's in the C files. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 11 +++ arch/arm/mach-omap2

[PATCH 09/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: define cpuidle statically

Use the new cpuidle API and define in the driver the states. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 86 +--- 1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.

[PATCH 01/18][V3] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field

The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c |9 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle4

[PATCH 18/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - set global variables static

and check the powerdomain lookup is successful. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c index 0

[PATCH 15/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - simplify next_valid_state

Simplify the indentation by removing the useless 'else' statement. Remove the first loop for the 'idx' search as we have it already with the 'index' passed as parameter. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 53 +-

[PATCH 12/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove cpuidle_params_table

We do not longer need the ''cpuidle_params_table' array as we defined the states in the driver and we checked they are all valid. We also remove the structure definition as it is no longer used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 28

[PATCH 13/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: define statically the omap3_idle_data

Initialize the omap3_idle_data array at compile time, that will allow to remove the initialization at boot time. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 37 - 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletio

[PATCH 11/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove the 'valid' field

With the previous changes all the states are valid, except the last state which can be handled by decreasing the number of states. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) di

[PATCH 00/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3/4 : cpuidle34xx and cpuidle44xx cleanups

This patchset makes some cleanup on these cpuidle drivers and consolidate the code across both architecture. Tested on OMAP3 (igepV2). Partially tested on OMAP4 (pandaboard), without offlining the cpu1. V3 : * replace OMAP4_NUM_STATES and OMAP3_NUM_STATES by ARRAY_SIZE * Fixed changelog

[PATCH 10/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove errata check in the init function

The errata check is done in the next_valid_state function, no need to check that in the omap3_idle_init function. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 10 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx

[PATCH 14/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - use omap3_idle_data directly

We are storing the 'omap3_idle_data' in the private data field of the cpuidle device. As we are using this variable only in this file, that does not really make sense. Let's use the global variable directly. As the table is initialized statically, let's remove the initialization at startup too. S

[PATCH 02/18][V3] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration

The cpuidle API allows to declare statically the states in the driver structure. Let's use it. We do no longer need the fill_cstate function called at runtime and by the way adding more instructions at boot time. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimka

[PATCH 08/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove rx51 cpuidle parameters table

As suggested, this table is an optimized version for rx51 and we remove it in order to consolidate the cpuidle code between omap3 and omap4, we remove this specific data definition which is used to override the default omap3 latencies but at the cost of extra code and complexity. In order to not l

[PATCH 06/18][V3] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly

We are storing the 'omap4_idle_data' in the private data field of the cpuidle device. As we are using this variable only in this file, that does not really make sense. Let's use the global variable directly. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar --

[PATCH 05/18][V3] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time

We initialize the omap4_idle_data variable at compile time allowing us to remove in the next patch the initialization done at boot time. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 21 ++--- 1 fi

[PATCH 04/18][V3] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration

Add the static declaration for the omap4_idle_data variable because its scope is in the file only. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 07/18][V3] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot time

We initialized it at compile time, no need to do that at boot time. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 24 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/a

[PATCH 03/18][V3] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table

We do not longer need this table as we defined the values in the driver states. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 11 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ar

[PATCH 16/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3: set omap3_idle_data as static

Reduce the scope of the omap3_idle_data to the file as it is only used in cpuidle34xx.c. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arc

Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] thermal: exynos: Add kernel thermal support for exynos platform

On 16 April 2012 07:37, Zhang Rui wrote: > On 三, 2012-04-11 at 18:17 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote: >> Hi Rui, >> >> Thanks for looking into the patches. >> >> On 10 April 2012 06:28, Zhang Rui wrote: >> > Hi, Amit, >> > >> > On 三, 2012-04-04 at 10:02 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote: >> >> Hi Len/Rui, >> >

Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: add the cpuidle driver for WFI and ARM retention

On 04/24/2012 11:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Hi Linus, can you consider this patch for inclusion, please ? Yepps, patch applied with Vicent's ACK. Great, thanks ! -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for AR

Re: Fwd: GB question

How to know our board belong to v5 or v7+ I think this is what you are looking for: http://igloocommunity.org/support/Board_versions_and_markings -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twit

Fwd: GB question

Hi, All Can anyone help to answer this question? -- Forwarded message -- From: Linas Chang Date: 24 April 2012 19:11 Subject: GB question To: YongQin Liu Hi YongQin ** ** Sorry ,I have new question ** ** I try to burn GB pre-build image to snowboard ** ** I f

Re: No group tracks at Connect

All, I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it here - https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gid=0. Arwen is happy that that spreadsheet will be used for the session planning. I've ad

Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: add the cpuidle driver for WFI and ARM retention

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Hi Linus, > > can you consider this patch for inclusion, please ? Yepps, patch applied with Vicent's ACK. Thanks, Linus Walleij ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://li

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:38:43AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > > > >> Let me try last time.  What about having a late_initcall hook in > > > >> machine_desc? > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:38:43AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > > >> Let me try last time.  What about having a late_initcall hook in > > >> machine_desc? > > > > > > Also fine with me. > > > > > > > Shall I add Shawn's patch to my imx cpuidl