On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:54:26AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:38:43AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > > > >> Let me try last time. What about having a late_initcall hook in > > > >> machine_desc? > > > > > > > > Also fine with me. > > > > > > > > > > Shall I add Shawn's patch to my imx cpuidle patchset or should the > > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c and arch.h changes be submitted separately? > > > If separately, Shawn, did you want to submit this patch or should I? > > > > > Strange. Russell is not in the Cc list. I remember I added Russell > > into Cc when I propose the idea. Added him again. > > I didn't see any message in this thread cc'd to me, but that's not to > say I hadn't already read this patch. I don't have any comment against > it, but I do wonder how often this hook would be used. > I guess mach-* that use common cpuidle will likely need this hook.
> We do seem to have quite a number of late_initcall()s in arch/arm/mach-*, > so it seems to be a good idea - provided someone's willing to convert all > those users of late_initcall()s. Agreed. The late_initcall()s in arch/arm/mach-* will not scale for long time, since we are moving toward single build. -- Regards, Shawn _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
