On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five
> Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the
> toolchain build process a bit more...
>
> Mike Hudson and I talked about doing a hybrid LAVA/cbuild as a
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 14 March 2012 15:42, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Exynos based SoC's have two different naming conventions.
> One is S5PC_ and other is EXXX_. This patch adds
> generic code to handle EXXX_ connvention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> ---
> arch/arm/include
On 27 March 2012 15:54, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
>
> Change "reg" to "anatop-reg-offset" due to there is a warning of handling no
> size field in reg.
>
> This patch also adds the missing device-tree binding documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (
Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five
Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the
toolchain build process a bit more...
Mike Hudson and I talked about doing a hybrid LAVA/cbuild as a first
step where LAVA manages the boards and cbuild does the b
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, John Rigby wrote:
>> Looks like initial git clones always fail. I tried a simple job that
>> just trys to run git and it fails.
>
> Alexander noticed too; new ci.linaro.org setup was launching jobs which
> were actually
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, John Rigby wrote:
> Looks like initial git clones always fail. I tried a simple job that
> just trys to run git and it fails.
Alexander noticed too; new ci.linaro.org setup was launching jobs which
were actually pointing at old ci.linaro.org setup as web proxy. When
the
Greetings,
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) and the Linaro Platform
Group are excited to announce the availability our March 2012
development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.3-2012.03-2
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You s
Looks like initial git clones always fail. I tried a simple job that
just trys to run git and it fails.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Would everyone please finish up testing. We need to send links out to
the release team with all the bugs and builds. It looks like
tracking-panda-4430 needs filling out (chenglie)
omapzomm-4430 and omapzoom-4460 need "5's" in blank fields (chenglie)
aosp-4430 (chenglie)
gcc-4430 (chenglie)
kwg-443
On 03/27/2012 06:40 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:20 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
I suspect we'll need an ubuntu specific fragment as well as all the
other board fragments.
The Ubuntu packaging scripts check that various config options are set,
using these I have created
Platform/QA/TestCases/Ubuntu, and the 12.03 RC
>> > builds (for all boards and image flavors) at
>> > http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/, with build id 20120327-1 for
>> > hwpacks and 20120327-0 for the rootfs (nano, developer, alip,
>> > ubuntu-desktop and l
ds and image flavors) at
> > http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/, with build id 20120327-1 for
> > hwpacks and 20120327-0 for the rootfs (nano, developer, alip,
> > ubuntu-desktop and linaro-tv-xbmc).
>
> I think you got the '-1' and '-0' the wrong way aroun
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 10:37 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> You can find our current test cases at
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/QA/TestCases/Ubuntu, and the 12.03 RC
> builds (for all boards and image flavors) at
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/, with build id 20120327-1 f
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:20 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> I suspect we'll need an ubuntu specific fragment as well as all the
> other board fragments.
The Ubuntu packaging scripts check that various config options are set,
using these I have created an unbuntu.conf (attached) - I doubt this is
what
ld id 20120327-1 for
hwpacks and 20120327-0 for the rootfs (nano, developer, alip,
ubuntu-desktop and linaro-tv-xbmc).
For our main boards we also have a testing spreadsheet, were we
publish the official release testing, done by the dev platform
engineers. You can find the links at
https://wiki.linar
Hi Abhishek,
The test sheet for Origen is updated:
https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkxwyUNxNaAadDRDVl9TSHUweUk3eG9ndk9sNGxUVnc#gid=2
However, Wifi needs to be tested.
Blue tooth was not working for me, however this can be tested also.
With Regards,
Annamalai
On 27 Marc
Hi John,
On 26 March 2012 20:20, John Stultz wrote:
>So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally
> gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the
> linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this for 12.04, and doing so
> early so we can ma
From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
Change "reg" to "anatop-reg-offset" due to there is a warning of handling no
size field in reg.
This patch also adds the missing device-tree binding documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Cc: Shawn Guo
Cc: Mark Brown
Cc: Liam Girdwood
---
.../
Hi Perter,
I read some code lines of QEMU in the past week and have more understanding
about QEMU. But there are also a lot of things unclear in my mind. And I
beg you help me again.
First, I found there are some x86 instructions translated from TCG
instructions will access the "RAM device" direc
Hi,
The Google hangout plugin is closed source, so we would need someone
from Google to port it to ARM. According to the interwebs, in future
Google hangout should not need a plugin, but use WebRTC[1] standard,
but when exactly that is going to happen is not known..
Meanwhile the best bet is inde
20 matches
Mail list logo
