This fix adds a missing part in the [RFC 07/11].
It will be added in the next version.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot
---
kernel/sched_fair.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 044ffcc..b3a54f4 100644
--- a/
Shawn Guo wrote at Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:51 AM:
...
> To me, pin_config() and its parameters should be invisible to client
> drivers. For amba-pl011 example, do you think any of those SoCs will
> need multiple sets of uart pin configurations to switch for different
> working modes? If that's
Shawn Guo wrote at Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:26 AM:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:26:43AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Shawn Guo wrote at Wednesday, October 19, 2011 8:32 PM:
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:21:14PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > ...
> > > > +int pin_config_group(struct pinctr
On 10/24/2011 07:01 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>>
>>> a double check that this doesn't result in there being a spike in the
>>> results for 2011.10 would be good. If not, historical data needs to be
>>> measured for this change given that the said options weren't used while
>>> measuring the
>>
>> a double check that this doesn't result in there being a spike in the
>> results for 2011.10 would be good. If not, historical data needs to be
>> measured for this change given that the said options weren't used while
>> measuring the historical data.
>
> Neither the 2011.09 nor the soon to
On 24 October 2011 17:39, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This message is to inform you that the server hosting www.linaro.org has
> suffered a hardware failure. Our provider is in the process of troubleshooting
> this failure and they need to take the host server offline to preserve data
> integrit
Upon coming in this morning I had reports of failures to schedule jobs in
LAVA, and was noticing about that same time that the daily jobs that
normally run seemed to be missing. There was a lingering issue with the
network upgrade on Friday that was causing the problem, but once discovered
it was
Hi,
This message is to inform you that the server hosting www.linaro.org has
suffered a hardware failure. Our provider is in the process of troubleshooting
this failure and they need to take the host server offline to preserve data
integrity. Once the issue has been resolved we will bring the serv
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> but the question here is about pinctrl. does userspace really need to
> manipulate the pinmapping ? if we agree on that, then the question is
> on the userspace interface.
>
> assuming we want this, i can't see the performance argument b
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:48:19AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> (...)
> >> I was more thinking along the lines of one device per GPIO controller,
> >> then you ioctl() to a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Here's what I've got so far,
>
> More to come on Benchmarking, Andy's kernel process, LAVA and toolchain.
I stripped attachments in moderation and put them at:
http://people.linaro.org/~lool/zach-elce/Linaro_Android_Presentation.odp
http://people.lin
Here's what I've got so far,
More to come on Benchmarking, Andy's kernel process, LAVA and toolchain.
--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroo
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:26, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 16:35, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
2011/9/30 Grant Likely:
> I'm not convinced that the sysfs a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:48, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> (...)
>>> I was more thinking along the lines of one device per GPIO controller,
>>> then you ioctl() to ask /dev/gpio0 how
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
(...)
>> I was more thinking along the lines of one device per GPIO controller,
>> then you ioctl() to ask /dev/gpio0 how many pins it has or so.
>
> And there is also the question
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 16:35, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>> 2011/9/30 Grant Likely:
> >>> > I'm not convinced
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 16:35, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> 2011/9/30 Grant Likely:
>>> > I'm not convinced that the sysfs approach is
>>> > actually the right interface here (I'm c
17 matches
Mail list logo
