On 10/24/2011 07:01 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >>> >>> a double check that this doesn't result in there being a spike in the >>> results for 2011.10 would be good. If not, historical data needs to be >>> measured for this change given that the said options weren't used while >>> measuring the historical data. >> >> Neither the 2011.09 nor the soon to be published 2011.10 benchmarking >> was done using these flags. I'm not sure if I'll have the cycles to try >> this out this month or not. However, I'll add this to next month's testing. >> > > That is good news. > > Err - I was actually suggesting not adding it or making sure that the > new numbers you get with these options aren't used to plot the > historical performance of the toolchain.
agreed. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
