Hello,
This is a reminder note to inform that jenkins and Ec2 plugin on
ci.linaro.org will be upgraded
tomorrow UTC *06:00:00 a.m. Wednesday October 19, 2011*.
Complete details can be found below.
Any concerns, please let me know.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Deepti Kalakeri
D
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
>>
>> > Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro
>> > 11.10 release?
>>
>> According to the latest weather forecast, this should be a 3.1 based
>> kerne
On 17 October 2011 18:22, john stultz wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 17:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> Here are the kernels we're using on the second Android pre-release:
>>
>> Tracking Panda
>> Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+
>>
>> Staging Panda
>> Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ (coincidence)
>>
>> Beagle x
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 17:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Here are the kernels we're using on the second Android pre-release:
>
> Tracking Panda
> Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+
>
> Staging Panda
> Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ (coincidence)
>
> Beagle xM, Beagle, Panda
> Linux version 3.1.0-rc9-09767-g52e3
Here are the kernels we're using on the second Android pre-release:
Tracking Panda
Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+
Staging Panda
Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ (coincidence)
Beagle xM, Beagle, Panda
Linux version 3.1.0-rc9-09767-g52e3db9
Staging Snowball
Linux version 3.0.4-g7118ded
Landing Snowball
Linux
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro
> > 11.10 release?
>
> According to the latest weather forecast, this should be a 3.1 based
> kernel.
really? is that true for Ubuntu LEB as well? Andy/Ricardo?
_
All,
The second Android pre-release is done and has been smoke tested.
Abhishek will run each through our QA process.
Builds:
Tracking Panda
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/tracking-panda-11.10-release/#build=4
Tracking 4460
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linar
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:26:49PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:59:19AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Richard Zhao
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:59PM -0700
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On 17 October 2011 15:33, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:43 AM, John Stultz
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hey Amit,
> >> > In updating our tree to 3.1, I noticed the
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro
> 11.10 release?
According to the latest weather forecast, this should be a 3.1 based
kernel.
Nicolas
___
linaro-dev mailing list
l
Shawn Guo wrote at Friday, October 14, 2011 9:12 PM:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:53:33AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
...
> > Having the driver expose a list of all possible combinations of pin
> > configurations seems impractical, for the same reason as I objected to
> > the original proposal for
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> [Stephen]
>> I've started to look at porting the Tegra pinmux driver to your pinctrl
>> subsystem. In order to replace the existing pinmux driver, I need a way
>> to support configuring options such as tri-state, pull-up/down, drive-
>> strength,
Thanks for a long letter, took som time to read, but as usual it
contains good stuff!
I think you're talking about two things here:
1) The need to configure per-pin "stuff" like biasing, driving,
load capacitance ... whatever
2) The need to handle state transitions of pinmux settings.
I prefe
Hi Nicolas,
On 17 October 2011 15:33, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> > Hey Amit,
>> > In updating our tree to 3.1, I noticed the SCHED_MC config option
>> > dropped out of the savedefconfig and i
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:43 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> > Hey Amit,
> > In updating our tree to 3.1, I noticed the SCHED_MC config option
> > dropped out of the savedefconfig and it doesn't seem to be found in the
> > arm Kconfig.
> >
> > Is that e
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 11:23 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:32:06AM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
> > On 10/17/2011 09:14 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>
> Arun, don't drop people from the CC list!
Sorry 'bout that -- I did hit reply-all, but Evolution has a mind of its
own som
At Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:25:36 +0530,
Arun Raghavan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 11:23 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:32:06AM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
> > > On 10/17/2011 09:14 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >
> > Arun, don't drop people from the CC list!
>
> Sorry
Status report in more detail:
https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/WeeklyReport
Last meeting minutes:
https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/2011-10-11
== Highlights ==
- Considering what would be the next catalyst area to open a path
towards from OCTO
+ Platform architecture/UEFI/ACPI and its rel
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
>
>> "Filing" this bug report on linaro-dev for now, so I don't forget it.
>> I can't figure out how to file a but against linaro-overlay on launchpad.
>> (Any suggestions?)
>>
>
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> "Filing" this bug report on linaro-dev for now, so I don't forget it.
> I can't figure out how to file a but against linaro-overlay on launchpad.
> (Any suggestions?)
>
>
the overlay ppa is used for our ubuntu LEB effort. Bugs should go h
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:17:29PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:14:19AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> unsigned long omap_recalc_rate(struct clk_h
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> It's not a problem to associate multiple clocks to a device, we can do
> this now already. What a driver can't do now is
> give-me-all-clocks-I-need(dev),
> but this problem should not be solved at clock core level but at the
> clkdev
Do we know yet which kernel version we are targeting for the Linaro
11.10 release?
--
Tixy
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 06:53:03PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:20:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 04:48:52PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> >
> > > For example, devices that possible access to on-chip RAM, depend on OCRAM
> > > clock.
> > > On
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:20:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 04:48:52PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
>
> > For example, devices that possible access to on-chip RAM, depend on OCRAM
> > clock.
> > On imx53, VPU depends on OCRAM clock, even when VPU does not use OCRAM.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:32:06AM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 09:14 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
Arun, don't drop people from the CC list!
> Maybe it would be better trying to merge my jack detection first, so
> that jack detection mechanism can then be adapted (if needed) to fi
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 04:48:52PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> For example, devices that possible access to on-chip RAM, depend on OCRAM
> clock.
> On imx53, VPU depends on OCRAM clock, even when VPU does not use OCRAM.
So if the VPU depends on OCRAM the VPU should be enabling the OCRAM
clock.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 07:55:21PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 06:32:33PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:05:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 04:10:26PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:56P
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 13:18 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:57:39PM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
>
> > Have you had a look at the patches for UCM already posted several
> > months ago, and that I spent quite some time reviewing? Or are you
> > planning to start over from s
On 10/17/2011 09:14 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 13:18 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:57:39PM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
Have you had a look at the patches for UCM already posted several
months ago, and that I spent quite some time reviewing? Or are
Hi Arun,
I won't be at Prague for ELCE, but I'll attend UDS/LDS Q4 at Orlando,FL.
--
Wei.Feng (irc wei_feng)
Linaro Multimedia Team
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
___
linaro-dev mailing list
li
31 matches
Mail list logo