On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Richard Zhao <richard.z...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:26:49PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:59:19AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Richard Zhao
>> > <richard.z...@freescale.com> wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:59PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> > >> From: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.k...@canonical.com>
>> > >>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.k...@canonical.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <ja...@jamieiles.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturque...@ti.com>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> Changes since v1:
>> > >> Add copyright header
>> > >> Fold in Jamie's patch for set-to-disable clks
>> > >> Use BIT macro instead of shift
>> > >>
>> > >> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 4 ++
>> > >> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
>> > >> drivers/clk/clk-gate.c | 78
>> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > >> include/linux/clk.h | 13 ++++++++
>> > >> 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> > >> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
>> > >
>> > > I feel hard to tell the tree the clk parent, at register/init time. For
>> > > the
>> > > simple gate clk, the only way is to set .get_parent. But normally, for
>> > > clk
>> > > without any divider we set .get_parent to NULL. Maybe we can put .parent
>> > > to
>> > > struct clk_hw?
>> >
>> > For non-mux clocks, whose parent is *always* going to be the same, you
>> > should create a duplicate .parent in the clk_hw_* structure and then
>> > have .get_parent return clk_hw_*->parent.
>>
>> Maybe I do not understand what you mean here, but I think there is
>> something missing in the gate.
> yes, clk_gate can not set fixed parent in v2 patch. Mike means add .parent
> int clk_gate
> and set .get_parent in the ops.
Yes, it seems I was unclear. I mean to say that a .parent can be
added to any clk hw implementation (clk_hw_imx or whatever) and the
paired .ops (in this case, .get_parent) will know about it's
existence.
Regards,
Mike
>>
>> >
>> > This is analogous to the way clk_hw_fixed returns clk_hw_fixed->rate
>> > when .recalc is called on it.
>> >
>> > >> +
>> > >> +static unsigned long clk_gate_get_rate(struct clk_hw *clk)
>> > >> +{
>> > >> + return clk_get_rate(clk_get_parent(clk->clk));
>> > >> +}
>>
>> clk_get_parent goes down to clk_gate_set_enable_ops.get_parent below...
>>
>> > >> +
>> > >> +
>> > >> +struct clk_hw_ops clk_gate_set_enable_ops = {
>> > >> + .recalc_rate = clk_gate_get_rate,
>> > >> + .enable = clk_gate_enable_set,
>> > >> + .disable = clk_gate_disable_clear,
>> > >> +};
>>
>> ...but this does not have a get_parent pointer, so clk_get_parent()
>> for a gate always returns NULL which means that a gate never has
>> a valid rate.
>>
>> Sascha
>>
>> --
>> Pengutronix e.K. | |
>> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
>> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
>> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
