On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fathi,
>>
>> Sorry for the top post.
>>
>> Any specific reason why using the build from 0926 as the RC instead of
>> 0927? This is just because the images are created after
;s the the
build 20110926.
> This is just because the images are created after 00 UTC, so the
> images from 0926 are actually the ones built at the beginning of
> monday, and not after monday. This is critical for us because we
> usually have friday and monday for final integration, and
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> Hi Fathi,
>
> Sorry for the top post.
>
> Any specific reason why using the build from 0926 as the RC instead of
> 0927? This is just because the images are created after 00 UTC, so the
> images from 0926 are actually the ones built at the
JpN7
>
> Resources
> =
>
> Note: Wonder what to download? Instructions including download URLs are
> documented as part of the feedback form reachable through the URLs above.
>
> Ubuntu:
> * ALIP (Xfce desktop):
>
> http://snapshots.lina
g download URLs are
documented as part of the feedback form reachable through the URLs above.
Ubuntu:
* ALIP (Xfce desktop):
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-alip/20110926/0/images/tar/alip-n-tar-20110926-0.tar.gz
* Developer (text user interface + developer tools)
Hi,
I've updated the GettingInvolved wiki with some information
for contacting the various groups within Linaro. (Some of
these clarifications came from Loïc's response to a query
sent to contac...@linaro.org - thanks Loïc.) This is a good
reference for deciding where to post questions or for
dire
On 09/26/2011 05:37 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:10:32PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2011 01:40 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:33:08PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> +static void c
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:10:32PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 09/26/2011 01:40 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:33:08PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >>> +static void clk_gate_set_bit(struct clk_hw *clk)
>> >>> +{
>> >>
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:33:08PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > From: Jeremy Kerr
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> > Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette
> > ---
> > C
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:10:32PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 01:40 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:33:08PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> +static void clk_gate_set_bit(struct clk_hw *clk)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(clk);
> >>> + u32 re
On 26 September 2011 19:50, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:21:06PM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote:
>> - libpng optimization
>
> I've got interest in this one -- can anyone articulate potential wins?
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-multimedia/2011-September/74.
On 09/26/2011 01:40 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:33:08PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> From: Jeremy Kerr
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
>>> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:21:06PM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote:
> * Requirements for the next quarter - list of what is being considered
> is as follows (Items without a link in papyrs need still to be described
> and justified)
>
> - UMM Camera Demo - https://linaro.papyrs.com/page/4156/MMWG2011-1/
Mike,
On 09/22/2011 05:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> From: Jeremy Kerr
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles
> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> Add copyright header
> Fold in Jamie's patch for set-to-disable clks
> Us
Arnd,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:28:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ext4 has optimizations for flash media in it and btrfs is better by
> design.
Do you have a pointer to more info about what kind of optimizations for
flash media ext4 has? We tried to find something, but didn't so far.
rsc
--
> > * Ethernet
> >
> > Was buggered, is fixed now :-)
>
> When did it become un-buggered?
According to this bug log:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/673820
(my own entry ;-) it was 2011-08-31.
> Tim Klein here is trying to get said
> machine to boot over TFTP with NFS root and it
+++ Pawel Moll [2011-09-26 15:48 +0100]:
> > So I guess it must be no SATA because of broken PCI,
>
> True.
>
> > no MMC because of FPGA bugs (now fixed),
>
> Work-arounded ;-) (hopefully really fixed in near future).
>
> > no CF card because of (?).
>
> CF usability depends on the card. Mos
> So I guess it must be no SATA because of broken PCI,
True.
> no MMC because of FPGA bugs (now fixed),
Work-arounded ;-) (hopefully really fixed in near future).
> no CF card because of (?).
CF usability depends on the card. Most of the old cards Just Work (TM).
New cards tend to have some
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:04 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > > > Specifically, MMC and SATA media are unreliable and the best solution is
> > > > to try USB.
>
> BTW, what do you mean by "SATA media" here?
>
> PCI Express doesn't work (broken test chip, not the motherboard itself),
> so you can't use
Hi Botao,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Botao Sun wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> "GREP" is there, here is the result after I execute "busybox ps | busybox
> grep bin":
>
> # busybox ps | busybox grep
> bin
> 1042 root 0 SW<
> [binder]
> 1093 root 332 S
> /sbin/ueventd
> 1910 root
> > > Specifically, MMC and SATA media are unreliable and the best solution is
> > > to try USB.
BTW, what do you mean by "SATA media" here?
PCI Express doesn't work (broken test chip, not the motherboard itself),
so you can't use PCI SATA Host Controller and there is no HC on the
motherboard :-)
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 14:28 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > Specifically, MMC and SATA media are unreliable and the best solution is
> > to try USB.
>
> With the latest official firmware (and IO FPGA) from the VE CD 3.0:
>
> https://silver.arm.com/browse/VE030
>
> MMC with the default card clock of
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:20:14PM +0200, Nicolas wrote:
> > I think s/linaro/linaro-public/ and s/page/public/
> >
> > So:
> >
> > https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/public/4156/MMWG2011-1/#
> > https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/public/4157/MMWG2011-2/#
And for the record, once status.linaro.org is
> I've heard that due to bugs all high bandwidth devices are flakey.
They are getting better and better though :-)
> Specifically, MMC and SATA media are unreliable and the best solution is
> to try USB.
With the latest official firmware (and IO FPGA) from the VE CD 3.0:
https://silver.arm.com/
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> I think s/linaro/linaro-public/ and s/page/public/
>
> So:
>
> https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/public/4156/MMWG2011-1/#
> https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/public/4157/MMWG2011-2/#
>
thx!
___
lin
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 13:28 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 26 September 2011 13:19, Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> I've tried to use Linaro 11.08 nano image with vexpress 11.08 hwpack
> >> but the board hangs in the init
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ilias Biris wrote:
>
>> - UMM Camera Demo - https://linaro.papyrs.com/page/4156/MMWG2011-1/#
>> - UCM for Android - https://linaro.papyrs.com/page/4157/MMWG2011-2/#
>>
>
> how can we access this? i a
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ilias Biris wrote:
> - UMM Camera Demo - https://linaro.papyrs.com/page/4156/MMWG2011-1/#
> - UCM for Android - https://linaro.papyrs.com/page/4157/MMWG2011-2/#
>
how can we access this? i am asked for a login, not sure what to use.
thx
___
Hi,
I may not be the best one to answer: I use oprofile with regular wake-up and I
am testing on long enough use cases so that a wake-up every scheduler tick is
sufficient (like "top", it converges in some seconds to the right values).
I don't really have use of performance counter wake-ups and
Enclosed, please find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the Linaro
Release Weekly meeting held on September 22nd in #linaro-meeting on
irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC.
== Meeting Minutes ==
http://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/WeeklyReleaseMeeting/2011-09-22
== Meeting Log ==
http://irclog
Status:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/WeeklyReport
Last meeting minutes:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Notes/2011-09-20
== Highlights: ==
* Components released, only thing missing is test-content - that project
required a special check w
Hi
On 26 September 2011 13:19, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> I've tried to use Linaro 11.08 nano image with vexpress 11.08 hwpack
>> but the board hangs in the init script and I never get the shell
>> prompt.
>
> I've used the pre-built
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> I've tried to use Linaro 11.08 nano image with vexpress 11.08 hwpack
> but the board hangs in the init script and I never get the shell
> prompt.
I've used the pre-built 11.08 nano image [1] without problem. (Kernel
booting from NOR, no i
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 06:03:16PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote:
> The DA9052/53 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
> flexibility
> to support wide range of high performance application.
>
> It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
> control and o
Hi,
I've tried to use Linaro 11.08 nano image with vexpress 11.08 hwpack
but the board hangs in the init script and I never get the shell
prompt.
if I use the linaro 11.07 nano image with the 11.08 hwpack, the
vexpress board boot successfully. Did someone else face the same
problem ?
Regards,
Vi
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:08:36PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:27:01PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > + ret = platform_driver_register(&wm831x_clk_driver);
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + pr_err("Failed to register WM831x clock driver: %d\n", ret);
> > +
> > +
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:33 PM, ashishj3 wrote:
> The DA9052/53 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
> flexibility
> to support wide range of high performance application.
>
> It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
> control and other func
37 matches
Mail list logo
