On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Ricardo Salveti
> <ricardo.salv...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fathi,
>>
>> Sorry for the top post.
>>
>> Any specific reason why using the build from 0926 as the RC instead of
>> 0927? This is just because the images are created after 00 UTC, so the
>> images from 0926 are actually the ones built at the beginning of
>> monday, and not after monday. This is critical for us because we
>> usually have friday and monday for final integration, and getting the
>> images created at monday will actually reduce one day of work for us.
>> One example is that I usually update the base-files package at monday,
>> but this time the RCs are still using the old base-files package,
>> requiring then an image respin for the final release.
>>
>
> Due to release manager timezone etc. we aim for cutting ready to RC images
> by 1600 UTC on Monday.
> Can't we do the base-files update on Friday. Are there any other packages
> like kernel that need more
> up-front integration time?

The base-files package was just one example, but it's also common to
integrate other components, mostly from the landing teams. This time,
for example, we were just able to push the TI LT kernel after the 0926
build, as the tree was properly rebased and tagged at friday.

Cheers,
-- 
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to