Re: RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add USB PHY initialization for device

2011-09-01 Thread PANKAJ KUMAR DUBEY
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Hi Kukjin,     --- Original Message --- Sender : Kukjin Kim E5/Senior Engineer/SW Solution Development Team/Samsung Electronics Date : Aug 31, 2011 11:05 (GMT+05:00) Title : RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add USB PHY initialization for de

Re: RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS4: Code cleanup and remove extra functions.

2011-09-01 Thread PANKAJ KUMAR DUBEY
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Hi Kukjin,   --- Original Message --- Sender : Kukjin Kim E5/Senior Engineer/SW Solution Development Team/Samsung Electronics Date : Aug 31, 2011 10:42 (GMT+05:00) Title : RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS4: Code cleanup and remove extra functi

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread David Brown
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:40:27AM +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > I'm currently trying to get GCC to auto-detect what CPU to optimize > for by finding out what CPU it's actually running on (the user would > only have to pass -mcpu=native). It does this simply by reading > /proc/cpuinfo. > > The pr

Re: 11.08 Pre-built Images

2011-09-01 Thread Anca Emanuel
Is there an tutorial to install qemu in ubuntu and run some linaro image ? I want to test it. ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support for 8-bit bus width in SDHCI for ORIGEN

2011-09-01 Thread Tushar Behera
Hi Kukjin, On Wednesday 31 August 2011 06:31 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: Tushar Behera wrote: Platform data for SDHCI controller on ORIGEN board is missing the support for 8-bit bus width. The platform data is extended in sync with other EXYNOS4 machines. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- arch/arm

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support for secondary MMC port on ORIGEN

2011-09-01 Thread Tushar Behera
Hi Kukjin, On Wednesday 31 August 2011 06:23 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: Tushar Behera wrote: -Original Message- From: Tushar Behera [mailto:tushar.beh...@linaro.org] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:39 PM To: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; kgene@samsung

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:54:55 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 1 September 2011 17:21, James Westby wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer > > wrote: > >> We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've ever > >> done. One instance was trying to sync u-boot and

Re: [PATCH] RFCv2: video support for dri2

2011-09-01 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Younes Manton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Rob Clark wrote: >> To allow the potential use of overlays to display video content, a few >> extra parameters are required: >> >>  + source buffer in different format (for example, various YUV formats) >>   an

Re: Choosing the timer to use in benchmarking

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Hope
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:43 +1200, Michael Hope wrote: >> I was quite impressed with how steady the process clock was under >> different CPU loads. It doesn't seem to round up or down to a >> scheduler tick either which is nice. > > Hmm. Very

Re: Choosing the timer to use in benchmarking

2011-09-01 Thread John Stultz
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:43 +1200, Michael Hope wrote: > I was quite impressed with how steady the process clock was under > different CPU loads. It doesn't seem to round up or down to a > scheduler tick either which is nice. Hmm. Very interesting results! Its been a little while since I've looke

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread Zach Pfeffer
On 1 September 2011 17:21, James Westby wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer > wrote: >> We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've ever >> done. One instance was trying to sync u-boot and the other was trying >> to sync the TI LT kernel. John Rigby sugg

Re: [PATCH] RFCv2: video support for dri2

2011-09-01 Thread Younes Manton
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > To allow the potential use of overlays to display video content, a few > extra parameters are required: > >  + source buffer in different format (for example, various YUV formats) >   and size as compared to destination drawable >  + multi-planar

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've ever > done. One instance was trying to sync u-boot and the other was trying > to sync the TI LT kernel. John Rigby suggested the branch approach and > it seems to have worked,

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread Zach Pfeffer
On 1 September 2011 17:04, James Westby wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:51:25 -0500, Zach Pfeffer > wrote: >> Anyhow, we have a few ways to solve this issue. I would say that as >> long as we reference trees whose shas are reachable from the branches >> in the remote git, then we should be fine.

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:51:25 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Anyhow, we have a few ways to solve this issue. I would say that as > long as we reference trees whose shas are reachable from the branches > in the remote git, then we should be fine. From a manifest > perspective, we like to sync a tip bra

[ACTIVITY] Kernel WG Weekly Status report for week ending 2011-09-02

2011-09-01 Thread Mounir Bsaibes
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report for the kernel working group for the week ending 2011-08-26. == Meeting Minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-08-29 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2011-09-01

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread Zach Pfeffer
On 1 September 2011 05:59, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:13:08AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >> > Any other issues that I've missed? Where should we come down in this case? >> >> I say we stay the course and fix the issue of sha's disappearing. I >> feel this way becau

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Stubbs, Andrew
On 01/09/11 12:02, Pawel Moll wrote: >> If you search the specs on http://infocenter.arm.com for "Main ID >> register" you should get all the numbers you wish for :-) > > Apparently it's called "ID Code Register" for ARM9 and the expected (not > tested ;-) values would be: Thanks Paweł, this is ex

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] s5p-mmc: Fix ambiguous setting of data transfer width

2011-09-01 Thread Andy Fleming
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Chander Kashyap wrote: > mmc data transfer width is set as following: > WIDE8[5]: > 0 = Depend on WIDE4 > 1 = 8-bit mode > WIDE4[1]: > 1 = 4-bit mode > 0 = 1-bit mode > > In case of 4-bit mode reset 8-bit mode and > in case of 1-bit mode reset 8-bit mode and 4-bit

RE: [PATCH 2/4 v6] pinmux: add a driver for the U300 pinmux

2011-09-01 Thread Stephen Warren
Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, September 01, 2011 3:33 AM: > This adds a driver for the U300 pinmux portions of the system > controller "SYSCON". It also serves as an example of how to use > the pinmux subsystem. This driver also houses the platform data > for the only supported platform. > diff

RE: [PATCH 1/4 v6] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v6

2011-09-01 Thread Stephen Warren
Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, September 01, 2011 3:32 AM: > This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices. > These are devices that control different aspects of package > pins. Overall, I think this is beginning to look very good. Thanks for taking care of my requests. I want to

[PATCH] RFCv2: video support for dri2

2011-09-01 Thread Rob Clark
To allow the potential use of overlays to display video content, a few extra parameters are required: + source buffer in different format (for example, various YUV formats) and size as compared to destination drawable + multi-planar formats where discontiguous buffers are used for differen

RE: [PATCH 1/4 v5] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v5

2011-09-01 Thread Stephen Warren
Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, September 01, 2011 3:13 AM: ... > I will need Arnds or similars advice on it so we don't > grow a lib/mysql into the kernel with this kind of > schemes and get slammed for overcomplicating > things when trying to merge the beast. I /think/ the whole multi-row thing

[ACTIVITY] Power Management WG Weekly Status report week ending 2011-09-02

2011-09-01 Thread Mounir Bsaibes
Enclosed please find the link to the Meeting Minutes & Weekly Status report for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2011-08-26. == Meeting Minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-08-31 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/W

Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: DMA unmap only once in case of MMC error

2011-09-01 Thread S, Venkatraman
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Per Forlin wrote: > Reported by Russell King: > > mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, > cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00 > mmcblk0: retrying using single block read > > WARNING: at /home/rmk/git/linux-2.6-rmk/lib/dma-debug.

[ANNOUNCE] Power Management linaro-pm-qa test project

2011-09-01 Thread Mounir Bsaibes
The Linaro Power Management Working Group has created a Launchpad project to develop functional test suite for the power management blocks on arm: * cpuidle * cpufreq * cpu hotplug * sched_mc This test suite would allow to quickly spot configuration errors and regressions in existing functional

Re: Update on Gerrit deployment

2011-09-01 Thread John Stultz
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 10:35 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 08/28/2011 05:20 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > But I've got an open mind and am willing to try it out and figure out a > > workflow. I suspect for me it really won't be anything other then a > > different location to "gi

Re: [Request] Can Linaro-dev not send duplicate mail to recipients?

2011-09-01 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:45 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 21:05 -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > It seems the linaro-dev list isn't configed to avoid mailing folks who > > are already recipients of the email. > > Go to http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/options/linaro-dev >

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:23:37 +0200 Alexander Sack wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Christian Robottom Reis > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:19:08PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > > Hello Christian, > > > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:43:40 -0300 > > > Christian Robottom Reis w

Re: [Request] Can Linaro-dev not send duplicate mail to recipients?

2011-09-01 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:05:55PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > It seems the linaro-dev list isn't configed to avoid mailing folks who > are already recipients of the email. So if you're on linaro-dev and > you're also To/CC'ed in the email, you get it twice (three times if your > other work email w

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Pawel Moll
> > PS. The number I quoted are valid when "CPU implementer" == 0x41 (ARM Ltd.) > > What about non-ARM implementations from e.g. Qualcomm and Marvell? Sorry, I have no access to theirs specs and the ARM ARM (Architecture Reference Manual) does not enforce any particular numbering scheme. Some SA

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 01 September 2011, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently trying to get GCC to auto-detect what CPU to optimize for > by finding out what CPU it's actually running on (the user would only > have to pass -mcpu=native). It does this simply by reading /proc/cpuinfo. > > The p

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Mans Rullgard
On 1 September 2011 12:02, Pawel Moll wrote: >> If you search the specs on http://infocenter.arm.com for "Main ID >> register" you should get all the numbers you wish for :-) > > Apparently it's called "ID Code Register" for ARM9 and the expected (not > tested ;-) values would be: > > ARM926 - 0x9

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread David Gilbert
On 1 September 2011 10:40, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently trying to get GCC to auto-detect what CPU to optimize for by > finding out what CPU it's actually running on (the user would only have to > pass -mcpu=native). It does this simply by reading /proc/cpuinfo. > > The problem

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Pawel Moll
> I actually did look for a bit and never found a definitive list. I've > found descriptions of the bitfield and some sample values, but I haven't > seen an actual official list. That's correct, I don't think such a list exists (at least within official ARM specs). What I meant is searching for th

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:19:08PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > Hello Christian, > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:43:40 -0300 > > Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 01.09.2011 12:20, Pawel Moll pisze: >> Does anybody have a list of such numbers? ARM926 - 0x926 (atmel at91sam9263) ARM920 - 0x920 (atmel at91rm9200) I have some armv4t/v5t/v6 systems here but none of them under power. ___ linaro-dev mailing lis

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:20:21AM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > > Does anybody have a list of such numbers? > > If you search the specs on http://infocenter.arm.com for "Main ID > register" you should get all the numbers you wish for :-) I actually did look for a bit and never found a definitive li

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:19:08PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello Christian, > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:43:40 -0300 > Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > > Yeah, I have patch for that. But we cannot use before upstream

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Pawel Moll
> If you search the specs on http://infocenter.arm.com for "Main ID > register" you should get all the numbers you wish for :-) Apparently it's called "ID Code Register" for ARM9 and the expected (not tested ;-) values would be: ARM926 - 0x926 ARM946 - 0x946 ARM966 - 0x966 etc., you get the pict

Re: Tracking Android kernel tips and Android builds

2011-09-01 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:13:08AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > > Any other issues that I've missed? Where should we come down in this case? > > I say we stay the course and fix the issue of sha's disappearing. I > feel this way because its: > > 1. Technically feasible in the short term. > 2. Sav

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Pawel Moll
> Does anybody have a list of such numbers? If you search the specs on http://infocenter.arm.com for "Main ID register" you should get all the numbers you wish for :-) > Or else, perhaps people could just post any number they happen to know? For v6 and v7 processors, the /proc/cpuinfo's "CPU par

Re: [Request] Can Linaro-dev not send duplicate mail to recipients?

2011-09-01 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 21:05 -0700, John Stultz wrote: > It seems the linaro-dev list isn't configed to avoid mailing folks who > are already recipients of the email. Go to http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/options/linaro-dev and select "Avoid duplicate copies of messages". Interestingly, for me, t

ARM CPU part numbers

2011-09-01 Thread Andrew Stubbs
Hi all, I'm currently trying to get GCC to auto-detect what CPU to optimize for by finding out what CPU it's actually running on (the user would only have to pass -mcpu=native). It does this simply by reading /proc/cpuinfo. The problem is finding what magic numbers correspond to what CPU. I'v

[PATCH 2/4 v6] pinmux: add a driver for the U300 pinmux

2011-09-01 Thread Linus Walleij
From: Linus Walleij This adds a driver for the U300 pinmux portions of the system controller "SYSCON". It also serves as an example of how to use the pinmux subsystem. This driver also houses the platform data for the only supported platform. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- ChangeLog v5->v6:

[PATCH 4/4 v6] mach-u300: activate pinmux driver, delete old padmux driver

2011-09-01 Thread Linus Walleij
From: Linus Walleij This hooks the pinmux driver into the U300 platform and deletes the old machine-specific driver. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- arch/arm/mach-u300/Kconfig |2 + arch/arm/mach-u300/Makefile |2 +- arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c

[PATCH 3/4 v6] amba: request muxing for PrimeCell devices

2011-09-01 Thread Linus Walleij
From: Linus Walleij This makes the AMBA PrimeCell drivers request padmuxing for themselves in the same manner as clocks and voltage is currently requested. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- drivers/amba/bus.c | 49 - include/linux/amba/bus.h |

[PATCH 0/4] pin controller subsystem v6

2011-09-01 Thread Linus Walleij
From: Linus Walleij This is the sixth iteration of the controller subsystem, most changes are described in the first patch, copied here for reference: ChangeLog v5->v6: - Create an abstract pin group concept that can sort pins into named and enumerated groups no matter what the use of these

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v5

2011-09-01 Thread Linus Walleij
Damn gmail punished me when writing the reply, sent by mistake :-( And I intended to post v6 first. These parts were being typed as I screwed up: On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > function and group names shall match what is > presented from the pin controller driver. > >

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v5

2011-09-01 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > 1) There is still a 1:1 correspondence between what a function in the > pinmux core<->driver interface, and the pinmux mapping table. I believe > we need a 1:n correspondence. Yes I know that, but the positions were never about solving th