W dniu 25.08.2011 21:20, Christian Robottom Reis pisze:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>>> One thing to keep in mind is that developers will get these tools from
>>> Google during their SDK install. Are
On Friday 26 August 2011 03:18 AM, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Say has anyone else run oprofile on recent builds on panda?
>
> By recent I mean say anything since 11.07? Reason for asking is I'm
> seeing basically a very very small number of samples being recorded...
> as in there's no way thi
On 08/26/2011 12:12 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
1. Set up branch policy (naming, etc.) and enforce it on Gerrit level.
This may require revamping branching in other toolchain/* components
(upstreamed not from AOSP), but in the end we'll get really robust
development setup.
A
2011/8/19 Linus Walleij :
> From: Linus Walleij
>
> This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices.
> These are devices that control different aspects of package
> pins.
>
> Currently it handled pinmuxing, i.e. assign electronic functions
> to groups of pins of pins on primarily PGA
2011/8/22 Linus Walleij :
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> it seems there is not an actual example that gpio requests pin from
>> pinctrl yet. i might give one on SiRFprimaII.
>
> No good example yet, no.
>
> The reason is that for the U300 that I use as
It looks like just sending things to linaro-dev will be the easiest
and most transparent. Hopefully this will be one less thing to worry
about. I'll keep the alias around for a bit.
Now the question is should we shut down #linaro-android? Ideas?
-Zach
On 23 August 2011 07:46, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time passed since last update on Gerrit deployment, that's
> because work on complete AOSP mirroring to out tree took longer than
> expected. All in all, following was done:
>
> Revamped branching in our toolchain/* components, free
Hi all,
Say has anyone else run oprofile on recent builds on panda?
By recent I mean say anything since 11.07? Reason for asking is I'm
seeing basically a very very small number of samples being recorded...
as in there's no way this is right.
Log:
root@linaro-desktop:/home/linaro/ltj-1.1.90-d#
On 25 August 2011 14:53, Tom Gall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>>> wrote:
>>> > One thing to keep in mind is that developers will g
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>> > One thing to keep in mind is that developers will get these tools from
>> > Google during their SDK i
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> > One thing to keep in mind is that developers will get these tools from
> > Google during their SDK install. Are we going to wrap that install?
>
> The idea was to make some
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind is that developers will get these tools from
> Google during their SDK install. Are we going to wrap that install?
The idea was to make some of the tools available at Ubuntu directly,
so that's why it'd be good to kn
Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 4:13 AM:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, August 19, 2011 3:54 AM:
> >>
> >> This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices.
> >> These are devices that control different aspec
Adding linaro-dev.
On 25 August 2011 14:04, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind is that developers will get these tools from
> Google during their SDK install. Are we going to wrap that install?
>
> On 25 August 2011 13:12, Tom Gall wrote:
>> Hi Zach, Android WG,
>>
>> For 11.09 we'r
Highlights
https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1108/Release/Highlights
Upstream Build
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-11.08-release/#build=4
Staging Builds
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-origen-11.08-release/#build=5
https://android-build.l
+++ Christian Robottom Reis [2011-08-25 12:00 -0300]:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:43:50PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > Peter Pearse collected all his ALIP cross-build status work in a
> > google doc spreasheet using his @linaro.org login:
> > PPearses ALIP build status google doc has evaporated so in
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:43:50PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Peter Pearse collected all his ALIP cross-build status work in a
> google doc spreasheet using his @linaro.org login:
> PPearses ALIP build status google doc has evaporated so info is lost:
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AnPR4S1
Peter Pearse collected all his ALIP cross-build status work in a
google doc spreasheet using his @linaro.org login:
PPearses ALIP build status google doc has evaporated so info is lost:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AnPR4S1Uev7KdDhHM2RxVGFFY2VQM01MVEJXbTZ3TkE&hl=en#gid=0
(And I put quit
Sometime we are interested in following the symlinks, sometime not.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
clocks.c|2 +-
regulator.c |2 +-
sensor.c|2 +-
tree.c | 11 ++-
tree.h |2 +-
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clocks
Add the enum definition we can rely on for the next patches.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
display.c |1 +
display.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/display.c b/display.c
index ebc4de6..f06387c 100644
--- a/display.c
+++ b/display.c
@@ -63,6 +63,
Show in ncurses mode the gpio informations.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
gpio.c | 130 +--
1 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gpio.c b/gpio.c
index 562a11d..f7d2a10 100644
--- a/gpio.c
+++ b/gpio.c
@
Now we have the directory structure, we can address the different files
and read their content in order to store them in the tree nodes.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
gpio.c | 74 ---
1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 4 deletions
Now we dump the output to the stdout.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
gpio.c | 45 ++---
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gpio.c b/gpio.c
index 8e7499d..562a11d 100644
--- a/gpio.c
+++ b/gpio.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct gp
Read the gpio directory structure where we will read the different
data we are interested in.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
Makefile |2 +-
gpio.c | 103 ++
gpio.h | 17 ++
3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 de
Let's create the command options parameters and plug the gpio code
with the main code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.c | 26 ++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c
index b4575c4..cc9e871 100644
--- a
Hello list,
0xlab announced the new system testing utility for Android.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kan-Ru Chen
Date: 2011/8/24
Subject: [0xlab-discuss] [ANN] ASTER System Testing Environment and Runtime
To: 0xlab-disc...@googlegroups.com
Hi everyone,
I am glad to announce o
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:58:12PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > Not really. UART2_CTS can't be routed to arbitrary pads, but it can be
> > routed to more than one pad:
> >
> > #define _MX51_PAD_EIM_D16__UART2_CTS IOMUX_PAD(0x3
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Not really. UART2_CTS can't be routed to arbitrary pads, but it can be
> routed to more than one pad:
>
> #define _MX51_PAD_EIM_D16__UART2_CTS IOMUX_PAD(0x3f0, 0x5c, 3,
> 0x, 0, 0)
> #define _MX51_PAD_EIM_D25__UART2_CTS
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:12:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, August 19, 2011 3:54 AM:
> >>
> >> This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices.
> >> These are devices that control different
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, August 19, 2011 3:54 AM:
>>
>> This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices.
>> These are devices that control different aspects of package
>> pins.
>
> Sorry to keep harping on about this, but
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Jesse Barker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:07:07AM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote:
>>> How can we get consistent vendor support to get 3d acceleration working
>>> for the Linaro officially suppor
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:07:07AM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote:
>> How can we get consistent vendor support to get 3d acceleration working
>> for the Linaro officially supported platforms? If we are targeting last
>> version Ubuntu-bas
32 matches
Mail list logo
