u-boot + Android 'fastboot' protocol/commands support (was: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build)

2011-04-18 Thread Jim Huang
On 19 April 2011 14:28, Amit Pundir wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >>> That would be very nice. There's actually some documentation in u-boot >>> about fastboot (a README). I wonder if there's some support a

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread Amit Pundir
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote: > On 18 Ap

Re: Working around a Tegra 2 errata for Natty

2011-04-18 Thread Peter Maydell
On 18 April 2011 22:35, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi there.  There's a problem with the thread local storage register in > the Tegra 2 which is exposed by Ubuntu switching to GCC 4.5.  The > fault is quite serious and causes many applications to segfault. > There's more details in LP: #739374. > > The

Working around a Tegra 2 errata for Natty

2011-04-18 Thread Michael Hope
Hi there. There's a problem with the thread local storage register in the Tegra 2 which is exposed by Ubuntu switching to GCC 4.5. The fault is quite serious and causes many applications to segfault. There's more details in LP: #739374. The problem is Tegra 2 specific and is caused by bit 20 of

[NOTES] 4/13 Linaro Developer Platform Weekly Status Meeting

2011-04-18 Thread Tom Gall
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on April 13th in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC. https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Meetings/2011-04-13 Actions from the meeting where as follows

Embedded memory management interest group list

2011-04-18 Thread Jesse Barker
Hi all, One of the big issues we've been faced with at Linaro is around GPU and multimedia device integration, in particular the memory management requirements for supporting them on ARM. This next cycle, we'll be focusing on driving consensus around a unified memory management solution for embed

Embedded memory management interest group list

2011-04-18 Thread Jesse Barker
Hi all, One of the big issues we've been faced with at Linaro is around GPU and multimedia device integration, in particular the memory management requirements for supporting them on ARM. This next cycle, we'll be focusing on driving consensus around a unified memory management solution for embed

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread John Rigby
Thanks for the links Zach. On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > John, > > I pulled the tree from: > > source: git://gitorious.org/pandaboard/u-boot.git > branch: origin/omap4_panda_es2.0 > board config: omap4430panda_config > > (referenced http://omappedia.org/wiki/OMAP_Pandroid

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread Zach Pfeffer
John, I pulled the tree from: source: git://gitorious.org/pandaboard/u-boot.git branch: origin/omap4_panda_es2.0 board config: omap4430panda_config (referenced http://omappedia.org/wiki/OMAP_Pandroid_Main#Getting_Started) -Zach On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Mon,

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote: On 18 April 2011 14:40,   wrote: > From: Patrik Ryd > > I

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread Zach Pfeffer
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote: >>> On 18 April 2011 14:40,   wrote: From: Patrik Ryd In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for k

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread Jim Huang
On 18 April 2011 21:01, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote: >> On 18 April 2011 14:40,   wrote: >>> From: Patrik Ryd >>> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). >> hi Patrik, >> Does this imply that we requires u-boot as necessar

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote: >> On 18 April 2011 14:40,   wrote: >>> From: Patrik Ryd >>> >>> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). >>> --- >>>  tasks/kernel.mk |    4 ++-- >>>  1 files c

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-18 Thread Zach Pfeffer
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote: > On 18 April 2011 14:40,   wrote: >> From: Patrik Ryd >> >> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). >> --- >>  tasks/kernel.mk |    4 ++-- >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > hi Patrik, > > Does

[PATCH v2] S5P: GPIO Macro Values Corrected.

2011-04-18 Thread Chander Kashyap
S5PC2XX: Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong. S5PC1XX: Macro values for Driver Strength were wrong. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- Changes for V2: - Macro value order fixed. - Added Changes for S5PC1XX. arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/gpio.h |4 ++-

Re: Do we have a memory footprint evaluation of ubuntu-desktop?

2011-04-18 Thread Eric Miao
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Spring Zhang wrote: > > > On 18 April 2011 16:03, Dave Martin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:34:21PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this >> > i.MX53 >> > QuickStart board. There i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S5P:SROM config code moved to s5p-common directory

2011-04-18 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Chander Kashyap, On 15 April 2011 14:05, Chander Kashyap wrote: > SROM config code is made common for S5P series of boards. > smdkc100.c now refers to s5p-common/sromc.c for SROM related > subroutines. > > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > --- >  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/Makefile    |  

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S5PC2XX: GPIO Macro Values Corrected.

2011-04-18 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Chander Kashyap, On 18 April 2011 12:50, Chander Kashyap wrote: > > No need to change. As existing gpio configuration is as per s5pc1xx > specification. According to S5PC110 TRM, DRV levels are as following, 00 = 1x 10 = 2x 01 = 3x 11 = 4x Please fix it at s5pc1xx also. Thanks Minkyu Kan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S5PC2XX: GPIO Macro Values Corrected.

2011-04-18 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Chander Kashyap, On 18 April 2011 13:53, Chander Kashyap wrote: > Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong. > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > --- >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h |    7 +++ >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/a

[PATCH 1/2] Modified Powertop to support ARM processor

2011-04-18 Thread amit . kachhap
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap Added a compulsory field bogomips for each processor in case other fields like model is missing. Error handling code added in case of package id remains uninitialised. Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap --- cpu/cpu.cpp |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+),

[PATCH 0/2] Modified Powertop2.0 to support ARM processor

2011-04-18 Thread amit . kachhap
The following set of patches modify the powertop version 2.0 to work for ARM platform. The C states and P states was measured after doing these changes in powertop. Amit Daniel Kachhap (2): Modified Powertop to support ARM processor Added an arm compiler flag cpu/cpu.cpp |8 +++- 1

[PATCH 2/2] Added an arm compiler flag

2011-04-18 Thread amit . kachhap
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap Modified to extract correct elements of power_entry structure. Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap --- cpu/cpu.cpp |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/cpu.cpp b/cpu/cpu.cpp index 451c120..f9995be 100644 --- a/cpu/cpu.cpp +++ b

Notes & Actions: Linaro Graphics Working Group - Apr 13, 2011

2011-04-18 Thread Alexandros Frantzis
Hi, notes and actions from our Wednesday graphics working group call are available on the wiki: + https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-04-13 Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here: + https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Grap

Re: Do we have a memory footprint evaluation of ubuntu-desktop?

2011-04-18 Thread Spring Zhang
On 18 April 2011 16:03, Dave Martin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:34:21PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: > > All, > > > > It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this > i.MX53 > > QuickStart board. There is a large chunk of memory being reserved for the > > graphics/video dr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S5PC2XX: GPIO Macro Values Corrected.

2011-04-18 Thread Chander Kashyap
Dear Minkyu, On 18 April 2011 13:00, Minkyu Kang wrote: > Dear Chander Kashyap, > > On 18 April 2011 12:50, Chander Kashyap > wrote: > > > > No need to change. As existing gpio configuration is as per s5pc1xx > > specification. > > According to S5PC110 TRM, DRV levels are as following, > > 00 =

Re: Do we have a memory footprint evaluation of ubuntu-desktop?

2011-04-18 Thread Dave Martin
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:34:21PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: > All, > > It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this i.MX53 > QuickStart board. There is a large chunk of memory being reserved for the > graphics/video drivers, and the memory size reserved has to consider the >

Do we have a memory footprint evaluation of ubuntu-desktop?

2011-04-18 Thread Eric Miao
All, It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this i.MX53 QuickStart board. There is a large chunk of memory being reserved for the graphics/video drivers, and the memory size reserved has to consider the worst case. And we have to live with this before the unified memory all

[PATCH android/device/linaro/pandaboard] Decrease the sdcard partiton number in vold.fstab

2011-04-18 Thread Jeremy Chang
Due to ramdisk introduced that replace the rootfs partition, adjust the sdcard partition number. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Chang --- vold.fstab |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/vold.fstab b/vold.fstab index c17bb64..04b9690 100644 --- a/vold.fstab +++ b/vold.

[PATCH android/device/linaro/beagleboard] Decrease the sdcard partiton number in vold.fstab

2011-04-18 Thread Jeremy Chang
Due to ramdisk introduced that replace the rootfs partition, adjust the sdcard partition number. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Chang --- vold.fstab |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/vold.fstab b/vold.fstab index c17bb64..04b9690 100644 --- a/vold.fstab +++ b/vold.

[PATCH android/device/linaro/common] Decrease the partition numbers for mounting

2011-04-18 Thread Jeremy Chang
Due to ramdisk introduced that replace the rootfs partition, adjust the partition numbers to mount. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Chang --- init.rc |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/init.rc b/init.rc index 7f94a21..c2836b9 100644 --- a/init.rc +++ b/init.rc